Search for: "Hook v. USA" Results 81 - 100 of 105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm by Howard Knopf
Civil liberties groups in the USA were concerned that “the digitization of books would enable Google to amass a huge collection of information, including private information about  identifiable users, without providing adequate protections regarding the use of such information. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:54 pm
Hope you enjoy:Origin of NFL nicknames (CNN), Remember last year's AFL throwback uniforms, you know, the Bronco's vertical stripe brown socks, well here's the story on where they came from (Mental Floss),Reggie Bush returns Heisman Trophy, now what (LATimes)Taxpayers still on hook after stadiums abandoned (NYT)It's matches like last week's Spain v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Infringement At issue was whether signing a foreign contract gets an infringer off the hook. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 11:36 am
See Deposition of President of MediaSentry in BMG v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
App.4th at 114.Actual manufacturer off the hook. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 2:32 am
CA6 Home     PUBLISHED OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0275p.062008/08/04 Van Hook v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
  Might sound silly to you, but I thought Zach was a good blogger, I had respect for him because of it and I still do.So in reading Zach Scruggs' reply brief yesterday in USA v. [read post]