Search for: "Horton v. California" Results 81 - 100 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2010, 1:58 am by Mike
Holland and others were protesting the California Supreme Court's decision in Strauss v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Auto Stiegler from the California Supreme Court, as well as Preston v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:29 am by Joshua Matz
In the wake of the Court’s decision last Term in Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
As we await Thursday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 11:47 am by Mark J. Levin and Alan S. Kaplinsky
According to a forthcoming article by Professors Andrea Chandrasekher and David Horton in the California Law Review, more consumers and their lawyers would take advantage of individual arbitration if states enacted non-waivable statutes allowing an arbitrator who awards a prevailing consumer fees and expenses under a fee-shifting statute to augment the award with an extra “bounty” for winning the arbitration. [read post]