Search for: "Houston Production Co. v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 1:37 pm
By Natalie Barletta: In Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
NutraSweet Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The contaminants are primarily solvents and petroleum products related to wood treatment activities at the facility. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The other three defendants include the City of West Point, West Point Dairy Products, LLC, (WPDP); and Wimmers Meat Products, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 2:43 am
(Kilker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Houston County Health Care Authority v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:50 pm
#13: Pennzoil-Quaker State Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:56 am
A ruling Wednesday by a judge granting the defense judgment NOV in Nelson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 12:57 am
In Buckman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
In 1972, in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:03 pm
BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
" Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 194 NLRB 569, 470 (1971), et al. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
