Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
Guidance has also been provided by the Court of Final Appeal as to how such possible inconsistencies should be approached as a matter of construction. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:25 am
“Judges and other lawyers must learn how to deal with scientific evidence and inference. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
(See this analysis by Juliette Kayyem, former assistant secretary of homeland security in the Obama administration). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
The new regs didn’t specify how the Secretary should treat a minor misrepresentation. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
At the outset, I was struck by how unprepared the government seemed, how contrived the written opinions were, and how unscathed the challengers’ arguments went. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
In the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs sued five defendants: (1) The United States of America, (2) the Department of Health and Human Services, (3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services, (4) the Internal Revenue Service, and (5) the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
The basis of the motion was the "Department's" assertion of the attorney-client privilege with respect to both individuals, as they both formerly served as attorneys to the Secretary of the Department of Corrections. 4. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
They claim that heis therefore not a qualified candidate, and that as a result,the Colorado secretary of state may not place him on theprimary ballot. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
It should not be assumed that the paper decision is correct (for how can it be if fairness demands an oral hearing?) [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:14 pm
Held: Following Kerr v Department for Social Development [2004] 4 All ER 385, "the distribution of benefits is different from many other areas of civil law. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
IPSO have published guidance for journalists and editors on how they should display corrections and adjudications on digital articles and social media posts. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
How are we going to do that? [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:38 pm
” Citing McIntyre v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
The Court will also consider the conflicting approaches in Binbuga v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 551 and HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 1176 as to the relevance of evidence in relation to the foreign criminal’s rehabilitation and how much weight should tribunals accord to such evidence in the context of the above tests. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
Kansas v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
