Search for: "Howey v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:16 am by Doug Cornelius
The Delaware court sets the standard of review using the the four-factor formula set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
The policies further stated that such MNPI should never be disclosed to others who may use that information to make trades. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The legal system of the United States has its roots in the laws of England. [read post]
Howey and its progeny, to support claims that the crypto assets at issue were offered and sold as securities. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 11:04 am by John Murray
The SEC’s jurisdictional argument is based upon the “Howey test,” as articulated in the 1946 Supreme Court case SEC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm by scottgaille
  The Howey Test, deriving from a decades-old case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Lee Reiners
Were it not for the “efforts of others” prong of the Howey Test, the majority of digital assets would qualify as investment contracts. [read post]