Search for: "Howle v. Howle" Results 81 - 100 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2016, 4:58 am by Ben
As Elonora tell us over on the IPKat, the answer is unsurprisingly yes -  and the use is not protected by the doctrine of fair use nor by 'safe harbour' - confirmed by Arnold J in his 174-paragraph judgment in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Another v Tixdaq Ltd & Another [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch).The German head of digital-economy policy at the European Commission, Günther Oettinger, is considering rolling out  German and Spanish “Google… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am by Ben
The maximum damages allowed under U.S. copyright law of $150,000 could potentially be awarded for each track infringed, and as Grooveshark has been accused of infringing nearly 5,000 tracks in the lawsuit - that's a massive $736 million (UMG Recording Inc et al v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
 One of the latest sad judicial treatments of the Constitution comes from Maryland's intermediate court in the form of Hamel v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
At a 2014 panel discussion, Ford’s lawyer during that period, Benton Becker, explained another part of the President’s motivation was a 1915 Supreme Court decision, Burdick v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 11:10 pm
The Bear Stearns decision is faintly reminiscent of the decision at the heart of Odyssey Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
This winter forever will be remembered in the Northeast as the winter of the “bomb cyclone,” which gets credit for the 6º temperature and bone-chilling winds howling outside as I write this. [read post]