Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson, QC" Results 81 - 100 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Haldimann v Switzerland (Judgment of 24 February 2015, available only in French), the Second Section held that the conviction of four journalists for having recorded and broadcast an interview of a private insurance broker using a hidden camera was a breach of their Article 10 rights. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
Three recent judgments in the Court of Human Rights illustrate the increasing importance of the concept of “journalistic responsibility” in defamation cases considered from the perspective of the right to freedom of expression. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:46 am by INFORRM
The first part of this post raised the question as to what should replace the PCC, outlining the first three of the seven options recently suggested by Martin Moore. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 12 December 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment on the assessment of damages in three actions by Matthew Cooper and Imaginatik plc (“the Company”) against Mark Turrell ([2011] EWHC 3269 (QB)). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Judgment was handed down today in the privacy case of Zac Goldsmith and others v BCD ([2011] EWHC 674 (QB)). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
As many commentators have pointed out, the British press is not subject to regulation in the ordinary sense. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am by INFORRM
In a judgment handed down on 18 January 2012, the Court of Appeal in Ontario recognised, for the first time, that the common law of Ontario included a free-standing tort of intrusion on seclusion. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down judgment in the controversial case of Google Inc v Equustek Solutions  (2017 SCC 34) dismissing Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results (2014 BCSC 1063). [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The judgment in the Mirror Phone Hacking damages case of Gulati v MGN Ltd ([2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)) deals with a wide range of legal and factual issues. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
In the case of ML and WW v Germany ([2018] ECHR 554) (available only French), the Fifth Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 8 “right to be forgotten” application in respect of the historic publication by the media of information concerning a murder conviction. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am by INFORRM
That, as Mr Price QC for Sergeant Flood was at pains to point out, would indeed be a “charter for malice”. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Human Rights has held that the fact that singer was well known to the public and been the subject of well publicised rumours about her sexuality did not justify the broadcast of interviews about her relationships and sexuality. [read post]