Search for: "Hughes v. Social Security" Results 81 - 100 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
By contrast, in A, the claimant – who was part of a domestic violence victims’ Sanctuary Scheme – lived in a three-bedroom apartment adapted to her security needs. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Internet user has duty to secure network against use for infringement. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
Schrems is also the founder of “Europe v Facebook,” a group that pushes for social media privacy reform at Facebook and other companies, calling for data collection minimization, opt-in policies instead of opt-outs, and transparency in data collection. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
We had a post about this case by Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am by Barry Sookman
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In explaining the role of dissenting opinions in this constitutional and social dialogue, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote “A dissent in a court of last resort is an appeal to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day, when a later decision may possibly correct the error into which the dissenting judge believes the court to have been betrayed. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The second instance involves another BBC journalist, Roland Hughes, and his story about his part in helping another 'lifted' photograph to go viral without the author's permission. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
Owens: Crying wolf over the Trans-Pacific Partnership https://t.co/WQDJOIwsAI Hugh Stephens The TPP’s Intellectual Property Provisions: The “Worst Public Policy Decision in the Country’s History”? [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
The Brown decision took place outside the context of a threat to national security. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Richards and Kirsty Hughes Washington University in Saint Louis – School of Law and University of Cambridge. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
 This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
When the Continental Congress recommended in 1783 that the States pass laws securing copyright of authors, it did so after a committee consisting of James Madison, Hugh Williamson, and Ralph Izard were “persuaded that nothing is more properly a man’s own than the fruit of his study. [read post]