Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2017, 3:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States:  Sentence reduction due to retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines17-312 United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:41 am by Chip Merlin
Federal common law places form over substance, as recently exemplified in Hughes v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:21 am
"  In distinguishing Enfish, Judge Hughes stated:"We recently clarified that a relevant inquiry at step one is 'to ask whether the claims are directed to an improvement to computer functionality versus being directed to an abstract idea.' [See Enfish v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:26 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Sentencing Misprision of a felony A ten-month sentence, concurrent with a state court sentence is reasonable for misprision of a felony. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The right to a disciplinary hearing may survive the individual’s resignation or retirement from the position Hughes v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
 "Copyright owners are part of the problem [of the growing strength of the culture of the public domain]", he states. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah of CMS preview the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court on 12-13 May 2020 in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]