Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 19,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2019, 12:16 pm
The European Court of Human Rights on Tuesday rejected Italy’s request for referral in Marcello Viola v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:51 am
R (Aguilar Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Advice on Individual Rights in Europe and another intervening); R (Bibi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1482; [2010] WLR (D) 341 “R 277 of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules, which prevented entry clearance to a party to a marriage where one spouse was a United Kingdom citizen and either party was aged under 21 years, was a disproportionate inhibition on… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:44 am
Keyu and others v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Secretary of State for Defence: [2012] EWHC 2445(Admin) ; [2012] WLR (D) 261 “There was no duty under article 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on the Secretary of State to conduct an inquiry into deaths occurring before the Convention was adopted and the United Kingdom acceded to the Convention. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (Al-Saadoon and Another) v Secretary of State for Defence Court of Appeal “Iraqi detainees held in a United Kingdom internment facility in Iraq on the authority of the local criminal court were not under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 3:13 pm
A recent Federal Circuit ruling, Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:23 am
R (Al-Skeini and others) v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:28 am
E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission intervening) [2008] UKHL 66; [2008] WLR (D) 351 “The positive obligation imposed on the state and its emanations by art 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to prevent the infliction by third parties of inhuman or degrading treatment was not unqualified, and was an obligation to do all that was reasonably… [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:41 am
By Eric Goldman The Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 1:30 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:36 am
MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant and Appellee. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:04 pm
Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 11:15 am
The United States Supreme Court's decision in Arkansas Department Of Human Services v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Section 35 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State for Justice power to block the release on licence of prisoners sentenced between 1991 and 2003 to prison terms of more than 15 years, was not compatible with article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, providing that anyone deprived of his liberty had the right to have the lawfulness of his detention… [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 7:51 pm
Vilsack, a case challenging the ongoing failure of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to include birds under the auspices of the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (HMSA). [read post]
21 May 2009, 8:06 pm
In the case of Newfield Central School District v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:53 pm
”) The post State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:45 pm
Taylor (Pennsylvania State University) has posted Preserving Human Rights Across the Digital Domain on SSRN. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:14 am
Regina (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “A failed asylum-seeker awaiting deportation whose detention had not been properly reviewed had been deprived of safeguards prescribed by law and was entitled to damages for false imprisonment. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Migrants' marriage rule bias is disproportionate Regina (Baiai and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme requiring permission by the Home Office for marriage by people subject to immigration control or those who had entered the UK illegally contravened articles 12 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the right to marry and prohibiting discrimination for nationality or religion. [read post]
