Search for: "I.S. V. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 17,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although secondary sanctions are sometimes phrased in mandatory terms (i.e., persons found to have engaged in targeted conduct “shall” be designated for the specified sanctions), in fact the making of such a finding requires further action by the Executive Branch and is in fact discretionary. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
Second, the court doesn’t address the forum analysis, i.e., whether the social media account is a designated public forum, a limited public forum, or not a public forum at all. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:38 am by Holly
The group walked us through inventorship determination examples for AI-assisted inventions based on factors borrowed from Pannu v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
It is significant that the charge seems mostly related to mitigation, i.e. failure to act against the risks, and not just to assess them. [read post]