Search for: "IN RE: AMENDMENT TO THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULES"
Results 81 - 100
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of a lower court ruling that upheld a U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
In keeping with its faux neutrality and commitment to the rule of law, the Court’s decisions in these cases were all procedural. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
On July 6, the Supreme Court decided both cases. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 10:36 am
” Perhaps most surprising: despite early hype about the Apple-Google API, only Oklahoma, Alabama, South Carolina and Virginia currently plan to use the Silicon Valley compan [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 10:53 am
Oklahoma (Criminal Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.html Williams v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The ruling came in response to a complaint that said the administration has carved out an improper exception to federal conflict-of-interest rules for Moncef Slaoui, a former high-ranking official at GlaxoSmithKline. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm
Oklahoma (Criminal Jurisdiction) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlWilliams v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:07 pm
I'm not sure this is right, given the Supreme Court precedent allowing governments broad selectivity in deciding which facets of a problem to address first, see FCC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
On Friday, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma rejected an appeal of a lawsuit seeking a temporary injunction that would have prevented the President from holding his Tulsa rally. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
The appeals court judges said despite the companies’ power, they cannot violate the First Amendment because it regulates only governments, not the private sector. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am
Supreme Court if he wants to block Maryland and the District of Columbia from pressing demands for his business records as his reelection campaign gets into full swing. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Sineneng-Smith, arguing that “[u]nless and until Justice Thomas abandons the modern First Amendment entirely, one should regard with extreme skepticism his call for the re-examination of specific doctrines–like overbreadth and the rule of NY Times v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
The 5-4 majority in the Supreme Court maintained that courts should not issue rulings that change election procedures so close to election day. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Constitution, First Amendment protections, the technical limitations of geotargeting, and even the very definition of advertising. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
The court rejected the argument that the Arizona Supreme Court’s reweighing of aggravating and mitigating factors re-opened direct review. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am
” For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that “[a] court ruling will likely come by late June, amid the president’s re-election campaign. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court would have the final word. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:12 am
Law professor Eugene Volokh, whose writings have been cited by the Supreme Court, notes “that the flyers consisted solely of the messages ‘It’s OK to be white’ and ‘Islam is right about women,’” and that “such messages are of course fully protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
In 2006, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that the state constitution prohibits using eminent domain to take private property for economic development. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
The Colorado Supreme Court agreed with us that under the First Amendment, the advocates could not be prosecuted under a jury tampering statute. [read post]
