Search for: "IN RE: SUBPOENA MATTER"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 4:29 am
In August 2018, Joseph moved to quash the subpoenas. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:21 am
In In re Grand Jury, an unnamed law firm challenged a grand jury subpoena for documents withheld under a claim of attorney-client privilege. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:07 am
Chris Stewart (R-UT) and Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-OH) sought additional information on the matter, including all records and communications related to the improper disclosures. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:41 am
The chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, alleges that Russia abducted Ukrainian children and teenagers and sent them to Russian re-education camps, and that Russian forces deliberately targeted civilian infrastructure. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
(Low-key implication for emergencies: a few extra seconds getting out of a small seat won't matter because you're going to die stuck in the aisle.) [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm
That’s why EFF opposes mandated age verification laws, no matter how well intentioned they may be. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Group Seeks Disbarment of a Trump-Aligned Lawyer for a Key Jan. 6 Witness DNyuz – Charlie Savage (New York Times) | Published: 3/6/2023 In appearing before the January 6 committee last year, Cassidy Hutchinson, the former White House aide who recounted Donald Trump’s conduct in the lead-up to the attacks on the Capitol, shared how her original lawyer had tried to influence her testimony. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard oral arguments in In re Sealed Case, concerning the Department of Justice’s attempts to access Rep. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
“And this is my personal cell phone, Brian,” Perry said during his first exclusive interview on the matter with Fox News. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
First, the Clause, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, does not provide sufficient legal basis to resist wholesale a subpoena to testify before the grand jury in the January 6th investigation. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
They’re Trying to Topple Trump. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 9:38 pm
I tweeted about that, too:Today the UK CMA published its summary of calls with 6 third parties re. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:41 am
You should speak with your attorney to find out if you’re eligible to not appear in court. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 4:21 am
“Working with our sister agencies, we’re holding employers accountable to our state’s wage, benefits, and tax laws. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
At that time, the Commissionmay vote to proceed to hearing, return the matter to staff for furtherinvestigation, close the matter or authorize resolution of the matter throughguidance. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
At that time, the Commissionmay vote to proceed to hearing, return the matter to staff for furtherinvestigation, close the matter or authorize resolution of the matter throughguidance. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
But a discussion among the justices to establish a code failed to produce agreement, people familiar with the matter said. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:34 pm
Trump’s efforts to cling to his office after he lost his bid for re-election, a person familiar with the matter said… Continue reading The post “Pence Gets Subpoena From Special Counsel in Jan. 6 Investigation” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Courts might see those things as unreasonable intrusions when the purpose of the stop can be satisfied with a quick “here’s a piece of paper, you’re served. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 10:06 pm
We’ve also said we’re happy to make this enforceable through a contract, regulatory agreements, or other means. 2/4— Frank X. [read post]
