Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 2 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 81 - 100 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The Phillips Court observed that a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling government interest even if it has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Legal Applications of Marketing Theory, part 4 Steve Ansolbahahere & Jacob Gersen, Harvard University, Dept of Government & Harvard Law School, Consumer Confusion in the Law of Food (Are People Misled?) [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
The government maintained that it relies on RMC 701(g)(2), which states “the defense shall notify the trial counsel before the beginning of trial on the merits of its intent to ... introduce expert testimony as to the accused mental condition. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Specifically, the Tax Act amended the Code to prohibit employees from claiming unreimbursed employee travel and relocation mileage deductions for the 2018 through 2026 tax years. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Until recently, the IRS and Treasury Department were expected to complete for use in 2019 the major overhaul of the Form W-4 and related guidance in response to the Trump Tax amendments to Sections 3402, 3405 and other Code rules. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am by Howard Knopf
     Blacklock’s Notice of Motion and draft amended pleading re Health Canada;2. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State . . . . [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
Much of what passes for evidence in the comments section of a blog is not admissible in court. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am by Dan Maurer
The Majority’s Philosophical Defense of the CAAF’s Judicial Nature Justice Elena Kagan’s opinion defended the judicial nature of courts-martial and appellate processes by reciting a half-dozen examples where the military system is similar to a typical civilian criminal regimes in its most salient features (e.g., due process protections for the accused, an appellate review system, a stable body of governing case and statutory law, the res judicata effect… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
They’re running a little behind this year, so it looks like the last opinions will come down Tuesday or possibly even Wednesday of this week. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States about what the governing rule is in cases involving plurality decisions. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
The Oct. 5, 1973, Brief for the United States in In re Agnew. [read post]