Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 6-9(b)(5) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS"
Results 81 - 100
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
For example, the petition (Doc. 1), the Statement of Intent (Doc. 4), the Verification of Creditor Matrix (Doc. 5), the Certificate of Creditor Counseling (Doc. 6), Amended Schedules (Doc. 9) and several other documents appear to have been transmitted electronically by Mr. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
The trial court enforced the provision, ruling that it was not a penalty because it reasonably estimated the harm that would result from a breach, and actual damages were difficult to predict when the contract was made.1 On those grounds, the court of appeals affirmed.. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm
At least 19 district court decisions[6] accepted the argument, holding that installation and monitoring of the NIT software was authorized by the tracking warrant provisions of Rule 41(b)(4) and 18 U.S.C. 3117. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Family Court Act §1017 was amended by adding a new subdivision 5. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:56 pm
Deep State: Trump, the FBI, and the Rule of Law by James B. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm
In other words, the FBI was advising exactly what Ackies was advocating: real-time cell phone tracking warrants “should conform” to the FRCP Rule 41 tracking device rule, including the venue limitation of Rule 41(b)(4). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:11 am
Not according to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
B. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Family Court Act § 412(2)(d), Domestic Relations Law § 236B(5-a)(b)(5) and § 236B(6)(b)(4) were amended to fix the date of the biennial adjustment of the temporary, post-divorce and spousal maintenance "income caps" at March 1" rather than January 31', as currently provided. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Briefly put, the statute repeats parts of the common law definition of defamation, see Restatement (Second) of Torts § 559, comment b, which the Alaska Supreme Court in Gottschalk v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
On October 9, 2019, the White House issued two executive orders, Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents, (E.O. 13891), reprinted at 84 Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed most of the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order [1]largely on Chevron Doctrine deference grounds. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed most of the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom Order [1]largely on Chevron Doctrine deference grounds. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The petitioner appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which denied review without providing any reasons for the denial. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Amchem v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
§ 15A-1002(b) (2017). [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
DNC Rules Could Expand, Not Shrink, Future Debate Stage Politico – Zach Montellaro | Published: 8/5/2019 Democratic presidential hopefuls at risk of being elbowed out by the debate rules may have gotten a last-minute reprieve. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm
Continuing our new practice of posting North Carolina appellate court case summaries to the blog, this post provides summaries of the North Carolina Court of Appeals opinions published on August 6, 2019. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
She fell asleep at 6 PM. [read post]
