Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT TO RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 81 - 100 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Depending on the specific foundation, such a ruling could be useful in attacking affirmative action in other areas, including employment and government contracting. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm by Cory Carlson
, which prompted lower-level noblemen and lords to more or less force the king, under threat of war, into signing what was essentially a declaration of rights and an admission to the limits of his own power. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The CFPB rule also prohibits debt collectors from making misrepresentations about tenants’ eligibility for protection under the CDC Moratorium and allows violators to be prosecuted under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Clearly, traditional notions of the family must be re-examined in the search for rational and equitable social and legal policies. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:00 am by LaToya Powell
[Editor’s note: This post appeared last week on the School of Government’s civil law blog. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:56 am by Ken White
In some states the statute only lets you file the motion if you're being sued for your speech to the government, like the classic case of a citizen complaint about a nearby property development. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For one thing, in neither case did the petition present the question whether to re-examine the practice of treating Title VI and the Equal Protection Clause as co-extensive. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:23 am by Susan Brenner
go to the admissibility of the records themselves, only the foundation for their admission. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
Is it desirable, as a matter of public policy governing the practice of law, to remove barratry claims, legal malpractice claims and other claims of wrongful conduct brought against attorneys from the court system and divert them into private arbitration? [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
One can only speculate as to why the Supreme Court had re-listed the case several times. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
One can only speculate as to why the Supreme Court had re-listed the case several times. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:57 am by Eoin Daly
” Tacitly, therefore, there is an admission that the Abbeylara amendment is effecting a great deal more change to  existing law than a mere reversal of the Abbeylara judgment. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am by Michael Lowe
Ed. 944 (1928), SCOTUS ruled that wiretapping was not protected by the privacy provisions of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
In In re Mance, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled that flat fees are not earned upon receipt. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
One argument that often comes up in such cases is that many Sikhs wear short and blunt knives as their kirpans, taking the view that the kirpan is supposed to be a symbolic weapon, not a usable one; it’s possible that exempting such knives — even if they technically violate the law or a government agency rule — wouldn’t really undermine the interest in fighting crime. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
Centennial Chair of Law at the University of Texas Law School and Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin. [read post]