Search for: "IN RE BISHOP" Results 81 - 100 of 895
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2023, 3:15 am by John Jenkins
If you’re considering not making a Reg D filing, bear in mind a few cautionary points. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 am by jonathanturley
His filing alleges that he was “blacklisted” by the Bishop of Derby, the Rt. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New York's rent regulations may not work a taking on their face, but perhaps they're unconstitutional as applied! [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sarah Louise Bishop, Scenes a Faire, Novelty, and Genre Before 2013, no court of appeals affirmed use of scene a faire on motion to dismiss, and since then it’s happened a fair amount: 45% in last 5 years. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
James Madison gave hardly any attention to the national executive before the convention, but as Bill Ewald has observed, Wilson came prepared to argue from the very start for “a single President, elected for a relatively short term, eligible for re-election, wielding a veto power, and enjoying authority independently both of Congress and of the legislatures of the states”—in short, for the very structure of the office that actually emerged from the proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Observations Arising from the Decision on Jurisdiction in Re Evans”. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As demonstrated by the comments of Rodgers Ch in Re Christ Church Spitalfields [2017] ECC Lon 1 [at 624], diocesan registry work is rife with potential conflicts of interest; the retainer invites the registrar to advise and assist any of the office holders of the Church of England – churchwardens, PCC secretaries, archdeacons, diocesan staff, bishops – and their interests are not always aligned. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:18 pm by bndmorris
Eric Chiappineli was cited in the following article: Keith Paul Bishop, Will Mallory Doom Delaware’s Officer Exculpation Statute And Its Corporate Hegemony? [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 1:22 am by Frank Cranmer
To these examples must now be added Re Stourport Town Cemetery [2022] ECC Wor 8, in which Humphreys Ch granted a faculty to authorize the exhumation of the remains of the petitioner’s father and re-interment with the purpose of removing some jewellery from the deceased. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am by Frank Cranmer
They result from problems encountered on the afternoon of Friday 4 November, and early attempts to resolve them by re-posting.] [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am by David Pocklington
The Court was presented with no evidence to suggest that a faculty (or any other permission) was ever granted for the interment; the then Incumbent of the parish and the then suffragan Bishop of Pontefract in the former Diocese of Wakefield each stated that they were unaware of the re-interment and did not purport to provide any form of consent [3]; furthermore, there are no references to these events in the PCC minutes of the time, and  no entry in the Register of Burials… [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am by David Pocklington
The Court was presented with no evidence to suggest that a faculty (or any other permission) was ever granted for the interment; the then Incumbent of the parish and the then suffragan Bishop of Pontefract in the former Diocese of Wakefield each stated that they were unaware of the re-interment and did not purport to provide any form of consent [3]; furthermore, there are no references to these events in the PCC minutes of the time, and  no entry in the Register of Burials… [read post]