Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW" Results 81 - 100 of 2,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 5:46 am by Russell Jackson
  We vacate the class certification decision on this ground because common questions of fact do not predominate where an individualized case must be made for each class member showing reliance. . . . [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by Joel O'Malley
  These laws differ by state, but most states limit their medical data privacy laws’ applicability to medical providers, which definition would not apply to most employers. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:09 am
New business owners in Boston may find themselves grappling with a host of legal questions. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:21 pm
The customers allege that Comcast engaged in monopolization, attempted monopolization, and market or customer allocation through a series of acquisitions and cable system swap arrangements.The appellate court ruled that the lower court satisfied the “rigorous analysis” standard established in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation (2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,453, 552 F.3d 305) in determining that questions of fact or law common to class members… [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:08 pm by Moderator
Objet: Real estate agent liability Re: Any recourse? [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 3:10 am by SHG
A civ pro prawf at University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law School, Jason Kilborn posed this question on his exam. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:30 pm by Michelle A. McClure
 (Your communications counsel would be a good place to start, if you have any questions.) [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
 But, if that certification passes muster, be mindful of the rules governing re-certification. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
  In the class action context differences in state law cannot be swept away by electing to apply the law of a single state to all class members’ claims. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:42 pm
The trial court satisfied the "rigorous analysis" standard established in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation (2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,453) in determining that questions of fact or law common to class members predominated over individual issues, for purposes of meeting the certification requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:44 am by Ted Frank
Via Chamblee Burch and Solum, David Rosenberg and Luke McCloud have written a paper proposing that the "problem" of nationwide federal diversity class actions where there are differences in state law that would normally preclude class certification be resolved by a judicially-created "average law," whereby the rights of class members subject to plaintiff-friendly state laws be abrogated to benefit class members who are subject… [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:53 am by Erica Gann Kitaev
Brock Hornby of the United States District Court for the District of Maine denied the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class in In re Hannaford Brothers Company Data Security Breach Litigation. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Moore of the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, will be sitting in place of Chief Justice George in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
  The Tenth Circuit avoided addressing the merits of this law, but denied a challenge to the law by several out-of-state students based on the lack of any effect on them if the law was successfully overturned based on standing.In other words, the Court told the out-of-state students, "You're not the right ones to challenge this law. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:42 am by Christopher G. Hill
What to Expect When You’re Expecting LEED LitigationDoes Stricter Decertification Mean More “Leedigation? [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:26 pm by Richard Symmes
If you have additional questions please visit our bankruptcy lawyer in Washington state homepage. [read post]