Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
The central question of the case was whether section 4 of the amended act, which stated that the certificate of identification “shall be the only evidence permissible to establish his right of re-entry,” applied to a laborer who was already living in the country on the day the Angell Treaty took effect. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:27 am
These questions increasingly are wrapped up in the larger question whether corporations would be better off reincorporating under the law of a state other than Delaware, particularly Nevada or Texas. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
We vacate the class certification decision on this ground because common questions of fact do not predominate where an individualized case must be made for each class member showing reliance. . . . [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:09 am
New business owners in Boston may find themselves grappling with a host of legal questions. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
These laws differ by state, but most states limit their medical data privacy laws’ applicability to medical providers, which definition would not apply to most employers. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:59 pm
” In re Vioxx, at 93 (quoting In re Tobacco II, at 311). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:21 pm
The customers allege that Comcast engaged in monopolization, attempted monopolization, and market or customer allocation through a series of acquisitions and cable system swap arrangements.The appellate court ruled that the lower court satisfied the “rigorous analysis” standard established in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation (2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,453, 552 F.3d 305) in determining that questions of fact or law common to class members… [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:08 am
Judge Carl West denied the plaintiffs’ class certification motion on the familiar ground that common questions did not predominate. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:08 pm
Objet: Real estate agent liability Re: Any recourse? [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:30 pm
(Your communications counsel would be a good place to start, if you have any questions.) [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
But, if that certification passes muster, be mindful of the rules governing re-certification. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 6:56 am
Texas is a big state. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:53 am
Brock Hornby of the United States District Court for the District of Maine denied the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class in In re Hannaford Brothers Company Data Security Breach Litigation. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 3:10 am
A civ pro prawf at University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law School, Jason Kilborn posed this question on his exam. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:32 am
In re Kosmos Energy Ltd. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:42 pm
The trial court satisfied the "rigorous analysis" standard established in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation (2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,453) in determining that questions of fact or law common to class members predominated over individual issues, for purposes of meeting the certification requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am
In the class action context differences in state law cannot be swept away by electing to apply the law of a single state to all class members’ claims. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:44 am
Via Chamblee Burch and Solum, David Rosenberg and Luke McCloud have written a paper proposing that the "problem" of nationwide federal diversity class actions where there are differences in state law that would normally preclude class certification be resolved by a judicially-created "average law," whereby the rights of class members subject to plaintiff-friendly state laws be abrogated to benefit class members who are subject… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Moore of the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, will be sitting in place of Chief Justice George in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
