Search for: "IN RE CRAWFORD MINORS"
Results 81 - 92
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Texas in determining that Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute is not facially unconstitutional or unconstitutional as applied to an adult male’s solicitation of a minor female, outside the home, to perform oral sodomy. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Gagliardi, No. 06-4541"Conviction for attempt to entice a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity under 18 U.S.C. section 2422(b) is affirmed where: 1) section 2422(b) does not require the involvement of an actual minor; and 2) the statute is neither vague nor overbroad. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Minority—the MQD as a “weak” clear statement rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Crawford, No. 05-4173-CV-C, 2006WL 1779035 (W.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
. * * * * * For ninety percent of readers, everything you’re going to want to know about this post appears above. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Crawford, No. 06-5059 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded for trial where: 1) the trial court reopened proceedings after the parties' summation and after the jury had been charged and had begun deliberating; 2) the government failed to present an adequate legal explanation that would justify the reopening of the case without a motion from a party; 3) the prosecution elicited testimony that defendant's counsel knew about the evidence in… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Riggi, No. 061280 Conviction on charges arising out of involvement in an organized crime family, including racketeering, murder and related conspiracies, is vacated and remanded where admission of eight plea allocutions of non-testifying co-conspirators amounted to plain error under the intervening authority of Crawford v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 4:06 am
>> WELL, I DON'T -- WE CLAIMTHAT WE'RE ENTITLED TO ANEVIDENTIARY HEARING BECAUSEWE DID OFFER EVIDENCE INADDITION TO LIGHTBOURNE INTHE FORM.AND THERE'S SPECIFIC FACTUALALLEGATION THAT WE WOULDPROVE OUT, WHICH I THINK ISRELEVANT TO SOME OF THEMATTERS THAT THE COURT'SALREADY HEARD TODAY, WHICHIS THAT THERE IS A 30% ERRORRATE IN SECURING INTRAVENOUSACCESS IN A CLINIC SETTING. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:27 am
The committee will hear testimony from Christopher Krebs, the director of the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency; Amanda Crawford, the executive director of the Texas Department of Information Resources; and Christopher DeRusha, the chief security officer of Michigan's cybersecurity and infrastructure protection office. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
