Search for: "IN RE JIM SHARP "
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
If your boss is bullying you, it’s not because ‘that’s how nationals work’ or ‘you’re in the big leagues now‘. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
According to Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation Blog, "[t]he SEC seeks five specific statutory enhancements to its enforcement authority that collectively would allow the Commission to impose appropriate monetary penalties for serious violations and authorize greater penalties for recidivists. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
So on November 6th, exactly one year before the election, we’re planning to circle the White House with people. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
[31] Jim Brown, Sen. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
I think Will Rogers acted dopey per se, but he acted like just kind of a “Gee, shucks” common folk who had a very sharp way of looking at things. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
They’re also awesome. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IP Watchdog) Legal studies program suspended (just_n_examiner) Books as prior art (just_n_examiner) Northern District of Illinois continues as top IP court – Administrative Office of the US Courts 2008 Annual Report (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Re-exam delays cause trouble for patent owners (Law360) Recovering pate [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
But I would not stop there — I would certainly add Jim Haynes, as well as career CIA and other agency lawyers whose careers suffered inside government. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:48 pm
Now that Prigozhin has graduated from a U.S. indictment on charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States, to a brief criminal investigation in his home country for inciting an armed rebellion against the Russian government, to a possible dismissal of that investigation now that he’s turned around and departed for Belarus, we’re proud to say we knew him way back when. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
Her sharp wit was always able to make an exchange full of laughter. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:56 am
“We do not see any contradiction between the fight against terrorism and the protection of civilians,” Nicolas de Rivière said. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Better act fast to avoid mistrials: [tinyurl.com]10:25 AM Mar 23rd from TweetDeck NEVER let Outlook archive while you’re working! [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:54 am
Not So Easy - bit.ly/z5GZUe (Tam Harbert) Hacker Points to Weakness in LexisNexis Concordance - bit.ly/zjdXby (Evan Koblentz) Landmark E-Discovery Decision Recognizes the Appropriateness of Predictive Coding Review - bit.ly/yiwBVk (Squire Sanders) Electronic Medical Records: Legal Risks of Going Paperless - bit.ly/yLrr5x (Alicia Gallegos) Employment Discrimination Protocols for Discovery: They’re Coming - bit.ly/ycL6GF (Daniel… [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 5:26 pm
They’re breathing right down our necks! [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:18 pm
They’re breathing right down our necks! [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 1:52 pm
Jim McGovern, D-Mass., offered it as an amendment to the Farm Bill in July. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:34 pm
There was something very sad about the atmospherics of today’s testimony by Robert S. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
The previously unreported ad buys for Trump’s re-election campaign routed through a secretive limited-liability company known as Harris Sikes Media LLC were revealed in Federal Communications Commission rec [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and de-branding of… [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
I suppose another one of my bugbears is this – I think defamation law in Australia has moved away from being a tort that is about damage to reputation and has been re-defined fairly substantially as a tort for compensation for hurt feelings because something has been said that has the potential to cause damage to reputation. [read post]
