Search for: "IN RE OWENS MINORS" Results 81 - 89 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thus, AI may play a central role in the after-action reports of a future financial crisis— and we won’t have Tom Cruise in Minority Report[9] to prevent it from happening. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:46 am by Ryan Goodman
Giuliani, for example, “seized on a clip of Freeman passing Moss a ginger mint, claiming that the two women, both Black, were smuggling USB drives ‘as if they’re vials of heroin or cocaine. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
., a minor, appeals from a withhold of adjudication of delinquency entered following an adjudicatory hearing. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
West issued his decision April 9, 2004. *** Teamsters Local 579 (Chambers & Owen, Inc.) (30-CB-4550-1; 350 NLRB No. 87) Janesville, WI Sept. 7, 2007. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[I blogged an early draft of this essay three months ago, but I've revised it extensively since then. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm by Andis Kaulins
Maurice - 324Bourgogne - 344 bow - 366bracelet – 169 Braunschweig - 259breastplate - 133, 134, 333 Brickell Point - 374Bridestones – 152 Brigance - 30Brignogan – 325 Brimble – 138Brimham Rocks – 156 Brise - 349, 350Britain - 2, 11, 20, 27, 30, 31, 42, 84, 100, 113, 115, 188, 242British Isles - 4, 27-37, 107, 113, 163, 246 British Museum - 7, 330Brittany - 31, 188, 242, 324, 325, 346, 347, 348, 349Brizil – 327 Broceliande - 325Brodgar – 54 Broomend of Crichie… [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
Owens: Crying wolf over the Trans-Pacific Partnership https://t.co/WQDJOIwsAI Hugh Stephens The TPP’s Intellectual Property Provisions: The “Worst Public Policy Decision in the Country’s History”? [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]