Search for: "IN RE STAR SCIENTIFIC"
Results 81 - 100
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2008, 3:08 pm
“I grew up on Star Trek,” he said. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 12:39 pm
Conclusion We’re heading into a dangerous time. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:01 pm
"There's something wonderful about seeing stars that are so far away that you're looking back in time by billions of years. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 7:08 am
Someone observing the universe 100 billion years from now, the writer observed, would see stars and galaxies much more spread out, moving more slowly and utterly disassociated with their origins compared to today.In other words, according to this view, scientists can only observe the Big Bang because of the moment in time we're in, and applying the scientific method from a vantage point in the distant future would generate a different result.Schneier says… [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:19 am
That is what happened last week in In re Lipitor (Hempstead v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:39 am
Why is it then that it seems like we’re going backwards? [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:20 am
“God willing, the stars will align so that we will have the right president. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:07 am
"You're going to war with a corporation that owns a day of the week. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Much more media attention on the issue, polls are showing that political majorities across the country support reform, and the scientific evidence for marijuana’s medicinal qualities is too strong to question at this point (unless you’re the DEA). [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
Kate Winslet — This mega-star doesn’t try to mislead viewers about her scientific knowledge. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 11:32 am
Sin, penance, and dispensation -- the key elements of a scientifically-based climate policy! [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:18 am
In scientific journals the question is no longer whether humans are to blame, but how little time we have got left to limit the damage. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:13 pm
" Id. at 1941, citing Star Scientific, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
" The reason is plain: Facts do not "speak for themselves," and much "dot-connecting"--consider the constellations of the stars--is obviously without a true "scientific" basis, but is useful for our own human needs, such as a mixture of navigation aids and the desire to believe that the Universe is "meaningful" rather than irretrievably arbitrary. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:25 am
The Lone Star State has the first “junk science writ” law in the country. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:23 pm
We took one look at him and knew he was a movie star. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.In re Star Scientific, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:01 am
Their new novel—“The Terraformers” (2023)—led Scientific American to comment, ‘It’s easy to imagine future generations studying this novel as a primer for how to embrace solutions to the challenges we all face. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
They're just practicing bad medicine. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
They're just practicing bad medicine. [read post]
