Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF J. B., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 81 - 100 of 272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm
Arguably a Wigmore sort of privilege might apply [see Spence J.'s discussion of qualified privilege in Slavutych v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 11:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Despite Brandi's put-offs, Arbogast testified that he thought he could persuade Brandi and so continued to play along, indicating interest in the children only to get on the mother's good side. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:08 am
Meyer: [Deborah] Baker and [Matthew] Meyer were married in 1995 and had three children: J., born in 1998, N., born in 2000, and B., born in 2004…. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:31 am by umbrella
Section 37(2.1) of the province’s Family Law Act states, (2.1) In the case of an order for support of a child, if the court is satisfied that there has been a change in circumstances within the meaning of the child support guidelines or that evidence not available on the previous hearing has become available, the court may,(a) discharge, vary or suspend a term of the order, prospectively or retroactively;(b) relieve the respondent from the payment of part or… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:31 am by umbrella
Section 37(2.1) of the province’s Family Law Act states, (2.1) In the case of an order for support of a child, if the court is satisfied that there has been a change in circumstances within the meaning of the child support guidelines or that evidence not available on the previous hearing has become available, the court may,(a) discharge, vary or suspend a term of the order, prospectively or retroactively;(b) relieve the respondent from the payment of part or… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm by Lucy Reed
McFarlane J echoed what he had said in Re W about the importance of parents taking responsibility for their children’s relationship with both parents: at para 59 Re D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1057, It is they [the parents] who, on those findings, hold the key that might unlock matters for B. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:15 am by Neil Cahn
Lauren B., Kings County Family Court Judge Javier E. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am by Patricia Hughes
(para. 38) Section 2(b) also protects the right not to be compelled to say something with which one disagrees (National Bank of Canada v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
In addition to a “verified petition” showing “that the circumstances of the child or one or both parents or joint legal or physical custodians have materially and substantially changed since the entry of the order to be modified” and that the modification is in the child’s best interest, both parents must also have complied in good faith with an applicable dispute resolution procedure. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
(mother) was the mother of the five subject children – two daughters, a now-deceased daughter, and two sons. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:37 am
A NEW SECTION OF KRS CHAPTER 213 IS CREATED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) A mother, an attorney, an agency or person with a legitimate interest in the parent-child relationship, and other similar state paternity registries may request at any time that the Cabinet for Health and Family Services search the registry to determine whether a man is registered in relation to a mother whose child is or may be the subject of an adoption. (2) If a petition for adoption… [read post]