Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF J. D., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 81 - 100 of 274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2017, 8:30 am by Liisa Speaker
            The MCOA reviewed the best interests’ standard and found that the termination of both parents’ rights was in the best interests of the child. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court did not release Jamie J. into her mother's custody when it dismissed the article 10 neglect petition. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Family Court did not release Jamie J. into her mother's custody when it dismissed the article 10 neglect petition. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Paxton, the court held that Texas cannot enforce its new ban on the most common method of second-trimester abortion—dilation and evacuation (D&E) without in utero demise—because doing so imposed an undue burden on the abortion right.What’s interesting about this case is not that the State of Texas lost. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by MBettman
R. 48(D) (Describing the guidelines for guardians ad litem (“GAL”), including a requirement on the GAL to represent the “best interest” of the child even if incongruent with the expressed interest of the child. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Congress asserted two interests in Nguyen—preventing fraudulent citizenship claims and ensuring the establishment of ties between the child and the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
And in case you missed these: Police hunt for mother who has abducted her own children – what on earth is going on? [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But, in 2011, “the Florida Legislature learned that a pediatrician in Ocala had reportedly told a mother that she would have to find a new physician for her child due to her refusal to disclose information about firearm ownership in the family home. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
For example, it has been held that late attendance for a school “session” may count as non-attendance (Hinchley v Rankin [1961] 1 WLR 421) and that the fact that a child had run away from home to live with her boyfriend, without informing her mother where she was, did not provide the mother with a defence (Bath and North East Somerset DC v Warman [1999] ELR 81). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by INFORRM
 Blog to follow on this Bodey J judgment which is interesting on transparency in the context of a financial remedy application in the family court. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
J (A Minor) (the 7 year old moved to his father because of abuse by his mothers insistence he was gender dysphoric, where evidence showed otherwise) was the other example AOL News referred to. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by familoo
I would be interested to know whether this inaccuracy crept in. [read post]
8 May 2016, 2:31 pm by Giles Peaker
In addition, Ms J, with whom they were staying, was claiming child benefit and child tax credit for O. [read post]