Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD" Results 81 - 100 of 835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Martin Kratz
Collins, 1987 CanLII 84 (SCC), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265, at p. 278 [v] See R. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:50 am by WSLL
The pinpoint citation in the P.3d portion will need to have the reporter page number. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:27 am by blacklobellolaw
Rivero, 216 P.3d 213 (Rivero II) added a new requirement to the previous Nevada ‘changed circumstances’ standard. [read post]
16 May 2009, 11:40 pm
Elizabeth Cohen, of CNN, authored an interesting article on the difficult task of receiving insurance coverage for a pre-existing condition. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm by Barry Sookman
The case came before the Court in an appeal from the accused’s conviction of a charge of possession of child pornography and a dismissal of a charge of making child pornography available using the P2P Limewire file sharing program. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm by Barry Sookman
The case came before the Court in an appeal from the accused’s conviction of a charge of possession of child pornography and a dismissal of a charge of making child pornography available using the P2P Limewire file sharing program. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:12 am by Eric S. Solotoff
She further claimed that "[t]he only reason [she] paid these expenses without seeking contribution [was] because [p]laintiff continued to pay the additional child support." [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
"[I]dentifying information about [P]etitioner (to protect her safety and effectuate the [c]hild's privacy concerns)," to include Petitioner's home address and other personal information; and 3. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm by Adam Wagner
” The supervisory jurisdiction (to the extent that it can be ousted at all) could only be ousted “by the most clear and explicit words”: see per Denning LJ in R v Medical Appeal Tribunal ex p. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 1:16 pm
In any of the above cases, it is important to hire an attorney to make sure that you are treated fairly during the process and your financial interests are protected. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
In 2011, a Texas court entered an “agreed order” appointing Young as Child’s “sole managing conservator” and limiting Hagel to “reasonable supervised visitation,” finding that it would not be in Child’s best interest for Hagel to have “specific periods of possession” of Child. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
The duty of the judge in all such cases shall be to exercise its discretion to look to and determine solely what is for the best interest of the child and what will best promote the child ´s welfare and happiness and to make his or her award accordingly. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:06 am by WSLL
Reversed and remanded in part.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF NC and AM, Minor Children, SC and FC, III v. [read post]