Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF JONES"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 4:20 pm
They were Timothy McVeigh, Juan Raul Garza and Louis Jones. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Jones v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:17 pm
In the matter of Suzanne T. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
It did not matter if the case was the most basic unwitnessed slip and fall or the most serious case of loss of life and limb—each case came with a punitive damage claim. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
This decision applies only to the matter at hand, the death sentence of Petitioner Jones. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:41 am
There was no indication that there had been protests, or that any bidder might able to compete on the government's IMR selection scoring process.But WorkCompCentral News discovered that in fact the process is not transparent and that CID Management, Inc. out of Westlake Village, CA, was competitive and should have been considered for the second round of the selection process.CID has filed a protest to the award contract so the announcement that Maximus was the successful bidder has been delayed… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
The person making the claim must first establish that he is a seaman as defined by the courts in the context of the Jones Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 1:45 pm
Using the above examples of what NOT to do and why it matters may help in that regard. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
Consent Decree (April 4, 2013); Mervin Jones v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 1:16 pm
Ultimately, Jones & Day had to pay Teare (who declined reinstatement to her former position) back pay, 401(k) contributions, medical expenses and interest in the total amount of $107,000. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 1:16 pm
Ultimately, Jones & Day had to pay Teare (who declined reinstatement to her former position) back pay, 401(k) contributions, medical expenses and interest in the total amount of $107,000. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. 1999) (holding that the NCAA’s appeal from an injunction granted at the trial court level was not moot as to the applicability of retroactive penalties). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. 1999) (holding that the NCAA’s appeal from an injunction granted at the trial court level was not moot as to the applicability of retroactive penalties). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. 1999) (holding that the NCAA’s appeal from an injunction granted at the trial court level was not moot as to the applicability of retroactive penalties). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
So Mrs Gow appealed to the Supreme Court for reinstatement of her award of £39,500. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:51 pm
The court recommended that the matter be remanded for further proceedings and noted that since sentencing had not yet taken place, Ms. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
But how the doctrine applies to foreign-purchased works — the so-called grey market — has been a matter of considerable debate. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
Arbitrator Jones’ award can be found here. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am
See Jones v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
The lower court had reversed Jones’ conviction, saying the FBI needed a warrant to track Jones. [read post]
