Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am
Hetronic alleges that Abitron secretly used confidential information to which it had access under the licensing agreement to reverse-engineer Hetronic’s products; Abitron then sold those products to Hetronic’s customers as if they were genuine Hetronic devices. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:18 am
The decision in question, made by the General Court of the EU – Standard International Management LLC v EUIPO – has clarified that use of EU trade marks in advertisements and offers for sale constitute acts of use of an EU trade mark. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:58 am
In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 11:08 am
’(Internal citations omitted.) [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
While a use provision need not expressly use the words “used for,” see StoreWALL, LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:49 am
Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:29 am
Tuesday, Judge Davis of the Eastern District of Texas entered a permanent injunction against Microsoft, enjoining the company from:1. selling, offering to sell, and/or importing in or into the United States any Infringing and Future Word Products that have the capability of opening a .XML, .DOCX, or .DOCM file ("an XML file") containing custom XML;2. using any Infringing and Future Word Products to open an XML file containing custom XML;3.… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Implant Direct Sybron Intern. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:25 am
[Defendant uses products manufactured overseas to] determine sales force compensation. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 1:15 pm
Whether TT is entitled to reasonable royalties from IBG because it made the accused product in the United States even though they were used by customers overseas. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:13 am
If you handle classification cases in the Court of International Trade, this is an important case: Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 6:17 pm
That said, I am still reading court cases.I'm going to make short work of Spring Creative Products Group v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
On the other hand, the court found it significant that the SEC had not sought to compel production of the documents, though it could have done so using (unspecified) means unavailable to the receiver. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
If the primary intended use of the product is achieved through chemical action or by being metabolized by the body, the product is usually a drug. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Court of International Trade (“CIT”), challenging the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
A use provision describes an article by its principal or actual use. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
A mark is ‘used’ when it was affixed by its proprietor onto the new product when that product was first put on the market. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
One thing you learn as a customs and trade professional is that there is international trade in just about any commodity you can imagine. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 3:30 pm
The product at issue in the Eurodif is low enriched uranium (LEU), which is used in fuel rods at nuclear power plants to produce electricity. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
Delaware, supra.That brings us to U.S. v. [read post]
