Search for: "In Interest of JKS"
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit: In re Grand Jury Subpoena, JK-15-029, 2016 WL 3745541 (9th Circuit 2016). [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
He isn't interested in creation incentives, but in inefficient over and underinvestme [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
[For really interesting writing on Spotify and the techniques used by the labels using their deals with Spotify to cut artists out of the payment loop, I recommend Kristelia Garcia’s excellentwork.] [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
These include the limitation of the obligation to publications that would involve the revelation of plainly intimate or sensitive facts (so, not for example in the JK Rowling case) [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
"OMG/JK Episode 2: Next of Kin" http://j.mp/aoQ2H4 reading @jdickerson ... [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 4:07 pm
It will also be interesting to see whether the outcome in London can carry some weight and indirectly affect the libel rematch next May in the US against Heard herself over an opinion piece she wrote for Washington Post. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm
The Daily Mail has printed an apology to the author JK Rowling in which it states that it has paid her substantial damages over an article that claimed she had told a misleading “sob story. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
Tobias explains: "The Benelux Trademarks Office (BBIE) joined the discussions on its Onel decisions [on which see the IPKat here and in earlier links] and gave shared some interesting views. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:24 pm
Just ask JK Rowling! [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:26 am
This is almost akin to a new fantasy author plagiarizing JK Rowling or J.R.R. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Naturally, the second limb of the Campbell test, balancing the individual’s right to privacy against competing interests (such as freedom of speech), is more prone to this issue. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:37 pm
Martin’s Press, I witnessed an interesting variation on Trillin’s Extravagant Lunch Principle. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 1:14 pm
Martin’s Press, I witnessed an interesting variation on Trillin’s Extravagant Lunch Principle. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:17 am
Third Session: Communities and CreativityRebecca Tushnet: Silbey’s choice of subjects are those who are the targets of IP law: inventors, artists, various types of intermediary facilitators like lawyers. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
The Lost Collection of Fritz Grünbaum, Gʀᴜ̈ɴʙᴀᴜᴍ Cᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ (2023), https://www.collectiongruenbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/JK-1839.pdf. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:52 pm
Ask any lawyer and he or she will tell you “oh, an interest fact about Section 287 of the Code – completely ignore it. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:30 am
That is, if there is a great public interest and I can show reasonable grounds for my claim it is not defamation of the deceased. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:18 am
—should give attention to this interest in microcreativity. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
It is an interesting and also a complicated issue to deal-with. [read post]
