Search for: "In Interest of LJ" Results 81 - 100 of 1,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the context of privacy rights, there is a distinct undertone of self-interest to the press’s opposition. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
In Sube & Anor v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor (Rev 1) [2020] EWHC 1125, Warby J (as he then was) distilled several points that had arisen from the limited number of authorities that have addressed claims for harassment by publication to the world at large (hereinafter simply referred to as ‘harassment by publication’). [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm by Christine Corcos
 We welcome applications from scholars studying law and jurisprudence whose research interests dovetail with the mission of the DeLaney Center. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm
 We welcome applications from scholars studying law and jurisprudence whose research interests dovetail with the mission of the DeLaney Center. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
Although the facts and specifics are interesting, that is not what this post is about. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
Thus representative actions are based on the commonality of interest between claimants. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down by Dame Sharp, Lauing LJ and Warby LJ in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1952 on 21 December 2021. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal held, in Nugee LJ’s lead judgment, that: Mr Print’s evidence at trial, so far as could be discerned, could not be taken as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
In upholding the first instance decision, Dingemans LJ reiterated the principles to finding malice from Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
An investigative reporter posed as a candidate interested in surrogacy, replied to the advert and secretly filmed the ensuing meetings. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
There are some interesting points of tension, to which I’ll return. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
As Arnold LJ clarified, these instances of accessio “all concern new tangible property which is produced by existing tangible property. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
The Court of Appeal, in Lewison LJ’s lead judgment, held that the test was the same as that for summary judgment. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Defendants’ relied on qualified privilege (duty/interest and reply-to-attack) as a defence, and a reply of malice. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
As Simon LJ put it in ZXC in the Court of Appeal, the police’s suspicion of a claimant may turn out to be well-founded or ill-founded. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Associated Newspapers Limited v Duchess of Sussex, heard 9-11 November 2021 (The Master of the Rolls, The President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Bean LJ) GUH v KYT, heard on 28 October 2021 (Collins Rice J) Soriano v Forensic News, heard 6 and 7 October 2021 (Sharp P, Elisabeth Laing and Warby LJ) Qatar Airways Group Q.S.C.S v Middle East News UK Limited and others heard on 4 October 2021 (Saini J) Abramovich v… [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
The claim cannot proceed as a representative action under Civil Procedure Rule 19.6 because members of the class do not have the same interest. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is to intervene over concerns about the use of facial recognition technology on pupils in lunch queues in the nine schools that have introduced the system in North Ayrshire. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The HawkTalk Blog has analysed the proposals in the DCMS consultation document, Data: a new direction, to change the “legitimate interests” in Article 6(1)(f) of the GDPR so that the controller’s legitimate interests always prevails in a limited number of pre-defined circumstances. [read post]