Search for: "In Interest of Peter B." Results 81 - 100 of 1,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 7:02 pm
Peter Hook has an interesting piece on SSRN, in which he maps, using various statistical techniques, the "topic space" of Supreme Court opinions--i.e., mapping the commonalities in the topical categories assigned to each case by West. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:45 pm
Lattman even acknowledges that he gives Bill "lots of airtime," and offers a three-tiered line of reasoning for being such a fan: (A) we can’t get over his wife’s vanity plate, (B) we’re interested in interesting niche legal practices and (C) his blog entertains us. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:37 am by Rick Hills
Conditional permanent residents are routinely deported in immigration hearings under INA section 216(b)(1) based on the "preponderance of the evidence" standard. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:28 am
Peter Apanel, the guy who's made a major pest of himself in criticizing the Paulson stadium deal, has uncovered an interesting tidbit that could throw a monkey wrench into the rush-rush schedule for the project. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:59 am by Rosalind English
In his concluding comments Peter Jackson J observed that this was a “bleak” outcome. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:27 am by Philip Thomas
The Mississippi Supreme Court's ruling on an appeal will be very interesting. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:05 am by Sonya Hubbard
In 1973 – two years before Microsoft (MSFT) was founded – Peter Karmanos, Jr., Thomas Thewes and Allen B. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
(Doig won; it was another guy named Peter Doige.) [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:27 pm by Amy Starnes
Peter Strand, a partner at the Chicago-based Leavens Strand & Glover LLC; Lawrence Waks of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP; and retired Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas Wallace B. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 5:41 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Under Florida’s non-compete statute, Florida Statutes Section 542.335(1)(b), “[t]he person seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant shall plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the restrictive covenant. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Rule 8.90(b)(10) is a "catch-all" provision that allows the court to use first name or initials "in other circumstances in which personal privacy interests support not using the person's name. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:29 am by David G. Badertscher
Queens Spy Shop CLINTON COUNTYFamily Law Court May Select Different Alternative Than Placing Child With Non-Respondent Father Matter of Keith "B. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]