Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 81 - 100 of 30,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
For example, the court in a case known as R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC), noted that “carrying does not require personal possession”. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:14 am by Eric Goldman
However, if you’re an old-timer like me, you’ll recognize how this exact argument was tried–and failed–in Noah v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
PS: in case you were wondering, you’re now one of 2,100 people subscribed to this newsletter. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:58 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
Following Commissioner Gomez’s confirmation, the Democrat-let FCC moved immediately to re-implement net neutrality rules. [read post]