Search for: "In Re: J.K."
Results 81 - 100
of 127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
Likewise, people will not generally switch from J.K. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:20 am
So, whether you are the next Hemingway, J.K. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:45 pm
Potter’s success transformed author J.K. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:59 am
" says peter martin http://j.mp/n5RMTT landmark decision from the european court of justice: "Intermediary liability: because you’re worth it (L’Oreal v eBay)" http://j.mp/pkZI00 reviewing all eight harry potter films: "Harry Potter films: Alfonso Cuarón saved J.K. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
So some folks, after their bankruptcy cases, will get to write the Great American Novel, and become as rich as J.K. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am
"J.K. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:23 pm
The folks at J.K. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:56 pm
J.K., App. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:59 pm
"If you're thinking about using J.K. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:07 am
I didn’t know any of that, but now I understand J.K. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
More generally: you just want to make your thing better/faster/cheaper; you’re still focused on the product. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:54 am
J.K . . . [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
Bolea; Wyner & Tiffany, Steven Wyner and Marcy J.K. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:05 am
In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,1 author J.K. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
That's because they'll let people know you're a motivated seller, and buyers will offer you less. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:48 pm
The Harry Potter series, by J.K. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 3:25 pm
, the Scribd Team goes one on one with the Times of London on copyright issues relating to Scribd, involving such famous novelists as J.K. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 10:52 pm
For instance, in J.K. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:01 pm
RDR Books, which lost in a copyright lawsuit filed by Warner Bros. and J.K. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:04 pm
LEGAL CASES: HARRY POTTER LEXICON BREACHED COPYRIGHT - In September 2008, a U.S. federal court judge held that a proposed book called The Harry Potter Lexicon contained no substantially new material and it breached copyright in the J.K. [read post]
