Search for: "In Re: National Football Leagu v."
Results 81 - 100
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
National Football League, a separate case: The NFL teams do not possess either the unitary decision-making quality or the single aggregation of economic power characteristic of independent action. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
He is one of only 48 workers' compensation attorneys in the United States authorized by the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) to represent its members. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Football Dataco Ltd, The Scottish Premier League Limited, The Scottish Football League Limited and PA Sport UK Limited v Sportradar GmbH & and Sportradar AG (IPKat) EWHC (Ch): Of access and excess: security for wizard costs: Allen (trustee of Adrian Jacobs) v Bloomsbury Publishing Ltd and J. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:56 am
Title: National Football League v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:48 pm
” Lydo Enterprises, Inc v City of Las Vegas, 745 F.2d 1211 1213, (C.A.Nev. 1984) citing Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm’n v National Football League, 634 F.2d 1197, 1202 (9th Cir. 1980). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Title: National Football League v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(Docket Report) District Court Western Pennsylvania: Defendant’s agreement to temporarily discontinue infringing conduct warrants grant of stay pending re-examination: TDY Industries Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
B plc [2003] QB 195) a married Premier League footballer failed in his attempt to obtain orders restraining a national newspaper from publishing stories about his sexual encounters with two women who wished to sell their stories. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
National Football League, 41 F.3d 402, 409 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S.1137 (1995); James v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 10:13 am
As someone very interested in copyright issues, she was disturbed by the National Football League’s overreaching copyright notice and posted a short clip of the copyright notice on YouTube and her blog.Predictably enough, the NFL filed a DMCA takedown notice with YouTube and got the clip removed. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
National Football League (Ladas & Parry) US Patent Reform The three-track proposal: Putting applicants in control of examination timing (Director's Forum) USPTO close to agreement with POPA to overhaul performance review for examiners (271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) US Patents 17 June - No Bilski today – again... [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
National Football League et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Clariti Eyewear, Inc. (271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) CAFC reverses BPAI's claim interpretation: In re Vaidyanathan (Gray on Claims) CAFC affirms claim construction and rejects indefiniteness argument: Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:47 pm
In brief, a 2001 agreement made between Reebok International and the National Football League (NFL) granted Reebok an exclusive licence for the rights to use the NFL's (i.e., all 32 NFL teams) IP (team trade marks, logos, etc) for baseball caps and other apparel. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am
Rejecting the National Football League’s claim that it has across-the-board immunity to antitrust law when its teams join in a commercial activity, the Supreme Court unanimously cleared the way Monday for trial of a lawsuit against the joint marketing of the right to use the teams’ logos and trademarks on consumer goods. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
[1] In this case, the National Football League (NFL) is arguing that its teams operate as a single-entity and therefore cannot be held in violation of anti-trust laws. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 4:54 am
Nat'l Football League, 634 F.2d 1197, 1202 (9th Cir.1980), and the JPL employees who choose to give up their jobs may later be made whole financially if the policy is struck down. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a patent on… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
We just want to make sure that it's licensed and you're getting paid. [read post]
