Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases" Results 81 - 100 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 6:26 am by NBlack
” Similarly, in In Re: Standard Jury Instructions In Criminal Cases-Report No. 2010-01 And Standard Jury Instructions In Civil Cases, Report No. 2010-01., the Florida Supreme Court issued a decision last week that adopted an updated version of the Standard Jury Instructions to include a section admonishing jurors to refrain from using social media and mobile devices during the… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  If four votes can be mustered one way or the other in any of the cases heard with the seat vacant, they’ll be decided; if the remaining six justices tie, Brown will review the case and cast the deciding vote, although he can also order re-argument. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:56 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Unlike the more rigorous standard for class action certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing class actions, federal court judges have traditionally been given wide latitude in deciding whether to grant collective action certification for alleged violations under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  In contrast, architects and engineers must meet a higher professional standard of care (see Civil Jury Instruction 600). [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm by Law Lady
  Employer-employee relations -- Whistle blowers -- Retaliation -- Jury instructions -- Causation -- New trial -- Discussion of proper standard of causation to be applied in cases involving employer retaliation under Whistle Blower's Act -- Trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant's request to instruct jury that it could return a verdict in favor of plaintiff only if it found that plaintiff's termination would… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Despite the best of instructions to a jury from a judge that sidebar conferences are a necessary part of a trial to deal with tangential issues, a jury will likely always feel that something is being kept from them and will also grow impatient with the delays caused by the conferences. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
"Because there is a reasonable probability that this erroneous instruction affected the jury’s verdict, we remand for a new trial. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
Doctors are going to come in this case and tell the jury what their opinion is of national standards, which should account for the very things that you're concerned about. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
  What we’re kvetching over in this post are plaintiffs seeking to interject FDA regulations with their lax causation standards into an ordinary common-law tort cases, typically alleging inadequate warnings or some related informational failing.Defendants should be vigilant against plaintiffs’ stealth preemption attempts either through the back door (some sort of expert opinion) or through the front door (asking the judge to instruct the… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
In voir dire you're looking not just at how individual jurors will respond to your case, but also how they'll work together. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 3:06 am
In voir dire you're looking not just at how individual jurors will respond to your case, but also how they'll work together. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
[ping.fm] phillyshortcite: @annereed re [ping.fm] Agreed; jurors entitled to tell others they're on a jury and to describe verdict afterwards. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
She then refused to stand precisely where she was instructed to stand, telling officers, “you can keep an eye on me from right here. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm by Aaron Pelley
The dissent thus argued that the jury should have been instructed on the aggravating factor. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:26 am by Tim Sitzmann
Juries frequently apply law to fact in all types of criminal and civil cases. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
Instruct the jurors on female excuses, so that good testimony proves they’re telling the truth, and bad testimony also proves they’re telling the truth. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:15 am by Steven Boutwell
The jury in the Robertson case was instructed to use the Kennedy “significant nexus” test in determining that the tributary Robertson polluted was in fact regulated by the CWA. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
P. 50(a) on the issue of obviousness before that issue was submitted to the jury and thus waived its right to challenge the jury’s implicit factual findings underlying the nonobviousness general verdict. [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:58 am by Kent Berk
§ 14-1306: Mediation; bench trial; jury trial; civil penalties. [read post]