Search for: "In Re: Turner v." Results 81 - 100 of 418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Revokey McRevokeface for McDonalds McMark Supermac's v McDonald's Cancellation no. 14787C, EUIPO (July 2019) I covered an earlier chapter of this burger battle in Volume V, in which poor evidence led to the loss of a BIG MAC EU trade mark registration. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am by Don Cruse
(No. 17-0905) Arbitration •  Local Immunity In re Comaneche Turner, as Natural Parent and Next Friend of M.T., a minor (No. 18-0102) Discovery •  Med Mal Nathan Robinson and Misti Robinson, individually and as Representatives of All Persons Similarly Situated v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
ICYMI: Preserving the sites of Nat Turner's Rebellion, in WaPo. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:47 pm by Sme
Commissioner, SSA (10th Cir., December 11, 2018) (affirming denial of disability benefits: Vigil failed to satisfy the criteria for any listed impairment)*Turner Brothers v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm by Wolfgang Demino
If we don’t do this,we’re going to continue to have judges who decide on their own who pays what,under what circumstances they pay it. **** * *[Representative] Turner: So, if you were to summarize what we’re doing withthis Bill, it pretty much is dealing with the issue of judicial discretion. [read post]