Search for: "In Re Adoption of Henderson"
Results 81 - 100
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am
Guest post by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) v Merck KGaA (formerly known as E Merck) [2021] 1 SLR 1102, [2021] SGCA 14 (“Merck”), noted previously, is a landmark case in Singapore private international law, being a decision of a full bench of the Court of Appeal setting out for the first time in Singapore… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
The Board of Trustees of Vincennes University (NFP) In Re the Adoption of R.B.H.; Mark L. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
Readers with a historical sensibility will recall Mary Jo Frug’s powerful feminist reading of the Dawson, Harvey, and Henderson Contracts casebook (Mary Joe Frug, Re-Reading Contracts: A Feminist Analysis of a Contracts Casebook, 34 Am. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:29 am
Bill Henderson writes a lot about the Rogers Diffusion Curve for organizational innovation, which is essentially a bell-shaped narrative of how innovation pervades a market: innovators and early adopters to the left, the majority in the middle, and the laggards to the right. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Pour la dernière semaine, les trois décisions en français les plus consultées ont été: 1. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Clinton re-nominated Garland in January 1997, and he was confirmed approximately three months later by a vote of 76-23. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
They’re looking for something to engage them and hold their interest. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Judge Walker, joined by Judge Henderson, held that the EPA failed to identify statutory authority for those regulations. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:18 pm
They'll say 'It's unethical, the ABA will never let it happen, it's the unauthorized practice of law, no no no.' But the vast middle isn't hostile and isn't adopting it; they're waiting to see. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
It was trite law that there was no basis for distinguishing between the costs of an in-house lawyer and an external one: Henderson v Merthyr Tydfil UDC [1900] 1 QB 434, as applied over the subsequent century. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
The fact that we're sure? [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
It was trite law that there was no basis for distinguishing between the costs of an in-house lawyer and an external one: Henderson v Merthyr Tydfil UDC [1900] 1 QB 434, as applied over the subsequent century. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:10 pm
Perhaps our travel funds have been somewhat reduced; perhaps we don’t have quite the freedom we’re accustomed to with regard to our favorite boutique seminars. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 5:33 am
Why so sad? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:21 am
Adopting specific outcomes to measure is equivalent to adopting what John DiIulio calls an “operational” goal—“an image of a desired future state of affairs that can be compared unambiguously to an actual or existing state of affairs. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
That PAJ application makes clear that, not just the adoption of the Third Restatement, but the overruling of Azzarello itself, would be a “dramatic shift” and “inconsistent” with the interests of future plaintiffs. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Henderson, 2007 WL 2484317, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 6:29 am
You’re, literally, pedaling magic. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
Henderson, 210 Ariz. 562, ¶ ¶ 19-20, 115 P.3d 601, 607 (2005) (fundamental error review applies to constitutional claims first raised on appeal). [read post]
