Search for: "In Re Advisory Opinion (Chief Justice)" Results 81 - 100 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Advisory opinions from bars—Cal. is the only state that pays attn to 1A doctrine when coming up with advisory opinions. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am by Michael C. Dorf
The majority, in an opinion by Justice Alito, said that because the petitioners hadn't made a sufficient showing that the Oklahoma protocol was substantially crueler than the alternative available means of execution, their Eighth Amendment challenge failed. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
For example, in In re Morgan, Pryor wrote an opinion holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
But the dissenting opinions of Justices Roberts, Alito and Scalia note that there are profound procedural and substantive defects with the reasoning of the majority opinion. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
Jeffrey Gorsky, former chief of the Legal Advisory Opinion section of the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:51 am by Howard M. Wasserman
” The purpose of standing, Dvoretzky argued, is to prevent courts from interjecting themselves to issue advisory opinions about the actions of the political branches — not to “micromanage” the conduct of litigation in discovery. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
Chris serves on the Board of Directors for the Institute for Local Self Reliance and represents Public Knowledge on the Board of the Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group (BITAG). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  Had Chief Justice Roberts cast his vote with his four typical compatriots, then we would have returned to the epic battles of the New Deal, in which a conservative Court, by a straight party-line vote, would have invalidated the signature political achievement of the “opposite party” president. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Chief Justice Roberts sounded a similar theme in his dissent in Obergefell. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 12:11 am
More likely, OLC and/or the Vice President had simply concluded that the funding restrction in 8131(b) was substantively unconstitutional, because it impinged on the Preisdent's Commander-in-Chief authorities (the Torture Opinion/NSA White Paper theory). [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Justices DeWine, Fischer, French, and Kennedy* No: Chief Justice O’Connor, Justices Donnelly and Stewart *Justice Kennedy would accept the appeal on all propositions. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the explanation offered by the Trump administration for adding the question – asking whether a person is a citizen – was inadequate. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Guest Blogger
” He had been one of the chief architects of the Evidence Code while at the LRCC. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am by Evan Lee
Chief Justice John Roberts might conceivably be one, given that he dissented in Hicks. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am by Jay Yurkiw
In my opinion it is malpractice to not seek a 502(d) order from the court before you seek documents. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm by Jeff Gamso
  But if you're old enough, you'll remember it.Of course, maybe it started with cave men. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
In this submission to the Inquiry, I want to suggest that the time has come to re-think the whole notion of press freedom – and indeed of the freedom of the media in general. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:26 am
The obstacle -- the central focus of a dissenting opinion in the D.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The action means administration officials can keep contacting social media companies for now while the justices weigh the case. [read post]