Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2021, 1:35 pm
On June 3, 2021, the Cal/OSHA Standards Board adopted an updated version of the Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) that phased out certain face covering and physical distancing requirements found in the November 30, 2020 version of the ETS, and implemented additional requirements for California employers. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:33 pm
Cal/OSHA has promised clarification on this point via FAQs. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 11:38 am
At least if they're all like this one.Or, more accurately, I couldn't do it. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
The post Cal/OSHA Considers Removing Exclusion Pay Mandate From New COVID-19 Emergency Regulation appeared first on HRWatchdog by HRWatchdog. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
We're spreading out the deduction because it's more accurate. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
(L) (B) or (D), at Father's option.etc. etc etc.You're making policy for California. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:54 am
Cal/OSHA staff will then decide whether changes are necessary and, if so, make them before they put before the Cal/OSHA board for a vote. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:33 pm
With another decade or so to go before your federal habeas round gets resolved and you're actually at risk of being executed.Here you go.I'm not saying that there might not be meritorious claims here. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Just a little hint: When you're riding a bike, minding your own business, and the police stop you because you don't have the proper lighting equipment thereupon (and, yeah, I'm sure that was their real concern), the first words out of your mouth should not be to proclaim: "I'm not on probation. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 11:09 am
Like the local rule here that says you have to give advance notice that you're going to call witnesses at trial.There are a ton -- ton -- of requirements for local rules. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:34 pm
I know that we're talking in this opinion about someone who's confused a lot, but I too was confused by this sentence (with an additional sentence for context):"Carrasco offered Veronica C. an appointment book, but she said she would not forget her appointment. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 1:57 pm
I understand that this is a dependency case, in which we're (sadly) used to seeing some pretty atrocious facts. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:36 am
I generally don't all that much like opinions that look as if they're unedited bench memos from the clerks or staff attorneys. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Gen., Cal. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
California law requires each parent (even if they're divorced) to support an adult child if they're disabled and unable to support themselves as a result. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:34 am
It’s their detainees — immigrants awaiting the outcomes of deportation cases or asylum claims, many of whom also work where they’re jailed, scrubbing bathrooms and cutting hair for $1 a day. ... [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:03 am
In re D.C., 2010 Cal. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 7:50 pm
Sometimes parental termination cases are difficult to even read (at least for me), as you're left with the firm -- and utterly depressing -- conclusion that none of the participants even have a whiff of a shot , and that the child both never had and currently has almost no shot whatsoever at a reasonable existence. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:49 pm
They're going to lose an election. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 12:42 pm
(See In re Lawrence (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1181, 1210 (Lawrence).) . . . [read post]
