Search for: "In Re Chappell"
Results 81 - 100
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2015, 9:01 am
Let’s imagine what happens if you sign on as Matthew Chappell’s nominee, the strawman to whom Fidelity will refer cases, which will then be funneled to Chappell with no involvement from you.It looks a lot like you’re participating in a fraud against Fidelity. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:36 pm
We’re not there now with Noah, though I would be worried if additional allegations came to light. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
That suit was later re-filed in the Central District of California and consolidated with a similar suit that was already pending there, brought by the named plaintiff Rupa Marya. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 11:20 am
We’re glad about the ruling, but we can’t help noting that the case casts some of the deeper problems with our copyright system into stark contrast. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
The First Congress enacted the Copyright Act of 1790, granting American authors the right to print, re-print, or publish their work for a period of fourteen years and to renew that term for another fourteen years. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
The First Congress enacted the Copyright Act of 1790, granting American authors the right to print, re-print, or publish their work for a period of fourteen years and to renew that term for another fourteen years. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:28 am
At least if you paid them to Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., good news: you might be getting that money back. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:49 am
We’ve given up caffeine and sworn off desserts / I don’t try to seduce you, we don’t even flirt / We’re too good to be happy, too straight to be sad / So just blow out the candles... [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
‘It’s the day and age we’re living in – people just take pictures – but you don’t want them taken,’ he said. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:29 am
It seems Twitter is removing 'recycled' jokes which have been re-tweeted. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:18 pm
Drivers owe their passengers a certain duty of care while they’re out on the road. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Chappell, No. 12-99005 (Berzon with Reinhardt and Gould) --- In this capital habeas case, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a guilt-phase ineffective-assistance claim for want of an adequate showing on prejudice. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:22 am
"The thing that the media’s gotta be real careful about, that they’re kind of overlooking, is the emotional context of what she means. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on which see her earlier post here]. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
Here comes the 33rd weekly round-up of last week's Katposts, recorded by the sensitive pen of Katfriend par excellence Alberto Bellan, who writes as follows:* When friendship is re-interpreted: Italy and San Marino take new view on IP rights Italy and San Marino's treaty on IP recognition seems to be over. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Chappell, 14-6264, a pro se petition in a capital case out of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
And hard as it is to believe, Chappell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
Chappell, striking down California’s state capital system due to decades-long delays. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
We end the Ninth Circuit hit parade with Chappell v. [read post]
