Search for: "In Re Craven" Results 81 - 100 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Detective Chief Inspector April Casburn has been convicted of misconduct in a public office by a jury at Southwark Crown Court after she admitted telephoning the “News of the World” on 11 September 2010, shortly after the phone hacking inquiry was re-opening. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm by Sam Murrant
First off, a summary of the proposals in the report – try this post by Edward Craven on Inforrm’s blog, which is both thorough and concise, or this post also on Inforrm by Aidan O’Neill QC. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 6:36 pm
"  They instead would have to voluntarily change a cynical political calculus that has secured Obamacare, Dodd-Frank and, of course, the President's re-election. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:18 pm by Michael C. Smith
Aflac, 2:11cv397 (8/16/12) Judge: Caroline Craven Holding: Motion to Sever GRANTED; Motion to Transfer DENIED Plaintiff did not oppose the severance after reading In re EMC, and Judge Craven agreed, severing defendant Aflac from the remaining defendants in this case. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am by Rick Hills
The result is councilmanic indifference to general policy, obsession with district-specific "pothole pork,"and craven pandering to any organized interest who can fund campaigns. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am by Rick Hills
The result is councilmanic indifference to general policy, obsession with district-specific "pothole pork,"and craven pandering to any organized interest who can fund campaigns. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:19 am by Charon QC
”We’re pretty sure we have just seen Louise Unmenschionable MP walking across the river.. on the bleedin’ water! [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am by Charon QC
Leveson continues to shed light and amusement on the nefarious deeds of press barons and the snivelling and craven behaviour of recent governments and politicians. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:35 am by Mike Scarcella
Theodore Frank of the Center for Class Action Fairness, in Washington, who challenged the merits of the settlement, said "we're evaluating our options, and consulting with Indian tribes. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
According to the statement in open court, the claimant sued for libel over an allegation in The History of the NME by Pat Long, published in February 2012: “The book included a passage that re-told an incident in 1977 when Mark Williams, a candidate for the position of [NME] editor, was arrested for drug possession. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm by Sam Murrant
Finally, open access to court documents (more and more necessary for accurate reporting as cases become increasingly paper-based) was also in the news this week, with a post by Edward Craven on Inforrm’s blog, commenting on the recent R (Guardian News and Media Limited) v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:01 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: "Universities told to get voters’ attention" pjblack.me/HFjn8S #highered #auspol more from @campusreview on teqsa: "Learn to work with TEQSA: Craven" pjblack.me/HFixcv #highered from @campusreview: "Being TEQSA ready – Curriculum reform in the age of Google" pjblack.me/HFirl2 #highered will big media ever die? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by Steve Baird
Until then, please remember these oldies, but goodies on the subject: lower case branding & visual identity i am ben Mayo Clinic Logo loses lower case visual identity Since I’m largely unavailable and figuratively fishing in Vegas at the moment, if you’re looking for some fresh content on the nuances of trademark law, I’d encourage you to check out John Welch’s post today on the TTABlog. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 12 March 2012, Eady J concluded the hearing of the second application to re-amend the defence in the case of Hunt v Times Newspapers. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In Tesla the claimants sought to distinguish Ferguson and IBM on the ground that the decisions predated the House of Lords’ judgment in Re S ([2005] 1 AC 593), which made it clear that Article 10 does not enjoy priority over any other Convention right. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm
This caused us to re-examine the premises on which our earlier opinion in Zoltek III was based, and to reconsider the consequences of that opinion. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:40 am by conn
”Warning that the issue “is something that is not going to go away,” Gallo said, “You may need to get a gun; you’re going to need it for protection. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
If your boss is bullying you, it’s not because ‘that’s how nationals work’ or ‘you’re in the big leagues now‘. [read post]