Search for: "In Re Custody of Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Should the abuser’s lawyer decline to assist in asking for sole custody because she has a hunch her client’s motives are immoral? [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:06 am by Tessa Shepperson
The salary is often below minimum wage — you’re expected to work on Saturdays without complaint — and the hours are brutal. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
“Unless a contrary intent is clear, the word ‘custody’ shall be deemed to include custody or visitation or both. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
Sometimes referring to the Consent Order or Judgment as a “Permanent Order,” the court also concluded the best interests of the child required the custodial terms of the Consent Order that placed T.S. in the primary physical custody with SHIREY V. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 4:11 pm by Howard Iken
Each and every time, Smith says, the deputy checks his backstop and says, “you’re good to go. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
But here at Relist Watch, we’re just giving the stuff away. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The 2016 Guidelines provide, among other things, that Aif a proceeding seeks to terminate the parental rights of one parent, that proceeding falls within ICWA=s definition of >child‑custody proceeding= even if the child will remain in the custody of the other parent or a step‑parent@ (2016 Guidelines [B][2] ). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
Vos, 18-672, presents an issue like one that the Supreme has seen before: whether Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act requires law enforcement officers to provide accommodations to a violent and mentally ill suspect in the course of bringing the suspect into custody. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Jack, 2018 BCSC 610 where Justice Smith held that Google was not able to show that the global delisting order made against it violated its First Amendment rights in the U.S. or the core values of the U.S. or that the California order undermined the effectiveness of the Equustek order. [read post]