Search for: "In Re INTEL CORPORATION "
Results 81 - 100
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
1, 2006); In re Intel Microprocessor Antitrust Litig., 452 F. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 7:19 pm
& Intel Corporation). [read post]
2 May 2019, 10:48 am
Over to Amy: "First to present was Vanessa Bailey (Intel Corporation, Washington, D.C) on “Fostering Innovation Through IPRs: The Corporate Perspective”. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:23 am
"Yeah, you're cool and what you're doing is ok," says one to another. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:57 am
., and Intel Corporation. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:45 am
Likewise, Cary Klafter, a vice president and corporate secretary at Intel, noted: "We're entering an era where every vote is a potential proxy contest. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
It looks like we're stuck with something which looks rather like a tort of unfair competition. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:46 am
., Apple has now been more proactive as it filed its own complaint against Qualcomm, though I wouldn't be surprised to see a similar one by Samsung.While we're on the subject of Apple and Samsung, or #appsung, just a quick update. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:56 am
Melamed previously was Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Intel Corporation. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
My Perfect Gig My Perfect Gig provides tools for online recruiting for corporate recruiters. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Also, I've received copies of three amicus letters in support of the petition (none of which appears on the Supreme Court's docket as of this writing): Amicus Letter of CJAC and California Bankers Association (dated 08/16/07) Amicus Letter of Intel Corporation (dated 08/10/07) Amicus Letter of VeriSign, Inc. and DENTSPLY International, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:17 am
We're very excited to have Barbara Nepf join our staff! [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am
Philosophically, this also makes it hard to imagine that an end-run could be achieved through a sophisticated corporate structure.As the district court cases in Northern (FTC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:42 pm
Whether you're trying to protect a product, license your IP or monetize, chances are that expensive litigation will be required. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:17 pm
You know a corporate law issue is hot if it is hotly debated around our Holiday table. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
Repeals the Patriot Act and the FISA Amendments ActFISC Reform: Increases term to 10 years but no reappointment Appointment of Special Masters to advise court (persons w/technological expertise) Warrant Requirement: Requires probable cause warrant to obtain info. on USP under FISACALEA: Gov't cannot require companies to build in accessWhistleblower Complaints: Gov't employee or contractor can file complaint on FISA violation/mismanagement to Comptroller or Intel. [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:26 pm
After all, HUJ says that it has extensively licensed Einstein’s intellectual property rights, including to companies such as “Apple Computer, Bell Atlantic, Citibank, Columbia Pictures, Daimler-Chrysler, Dell Computers, Deloitte LLP, Disney, Dow Jones & Company, Eastman Kodak, Einstein Noah Bagel Corporation, Epson, France Telecom, Hyundai Motor Company, IBM, Intel Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Kraft Foods, LegoLand, Mars, Microsoft, NASA,… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Intel Corporation v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 2:22 am
For what I know, however, chip makers Nvidia and Intel, while they're longstanding IP2I members, can't be blamed for the "Einzelfall" crap.Were IP2I only a fringe group of the patent reform movement, the others could still combat that "Einzelfall" term effectively. [read post]
