Search for: "In Re Interest of LJ"
Results 81 - 100
of 295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Mr Khuja’s appeal, with Sharp LJ giving the only judgment. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:06 am
Further the Court of Appeal determined that Reuters’ criticism of the Judge’s reliance upon Lion Laboratories (and in particular Griffiths LJ’s comment in that it will only be “an exceptional case in which a defence of public interest which does not involve iniquity on the part of the plaintiff will justify refusing the injunction”) was misplaced. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
Even in the interim with an appeal pending, Richards LJ could not be faulted for according weight to the public interest attached by Parliament to a foreign criminal’s removal because his approach constituted “a natural extension” of Lord Reed’s “great weight” analysis in Ali. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
On 20 June 2017 Macfarlane LJ heard an application for permission to appeal and a stay in the case of Lokhova v Tymula. [read post]
2 May 2017, 4:28 pm
Nope. https://t.co/tX705Dv0Qv #familylaw — transparency project (@seethrujustice) April 14, 2017 The President’s decision in the troublesome and unsatisfactory case of Re W explained Re W : a “most difficult and concerning case of its type” : https://t.co/64c2f4DFmH #familylaw #adoption — transparency project (@seethrujustice) April 12, 2017 An unusual case of judicial error and the Lord Chancellor’s liability for damages New… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Pitchford LJ found that s 25 did not interfere with art 8 rights. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:29 am
” This is … an interesting reading of the DMCA. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Joshua Rozenberg interviewed Lord Justice McFarlane on adoption for BBC Radio 4 Law in Action (following the recent inaugural Bridget Lindley memorial lecture) Fascinating interview by @JoshuaRozenberg with McFarlane LJ on #adoption: https://t.co/bw5rSdumIK; see further eg https://t.co/hRyHqWs22q. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Of course, I cannot exclude that something close to a miracle happened in the March 2017 meeting of the Administrative Council and that a substantial re-staffing of this and other Boards has meanwhile occurred. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
The judgment is interesting for the extent of the judicial redaction of facts for publication, to ensure the family could not be identified. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm
Appeal allowed and the matter remitted to the County Court with the article 8 defence re-instated. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
[para 198] According to Briggs LJ, the reason is a domestic one. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 4:09 am
Reporting of court proceedings “engages the public interest and has an intrinsic value” [24]. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
The defendants argue that these contentions are misconceived because the Court of Appeal correctly concluded that A v BBC did not alter the applicable principles – which are derived from Re S ([2005] 1 AC 593) and Re Guardian News and Media ([2010] 2 AC 697). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
The judgment addresses some interesting procedural questions regarding appeals. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Having failed to overcome the plausibility hurdle, the patentee was not entitled to rely on post-published evidence to show sufficiency.Claire raised some interesting points to consider at the end of her talk:In light of Kitchen LJ’s treatment of paragraphs [0003] and [0006], what is/is not to be recognised as a definition in a Patent? [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Evidence that a paper is interesting to the expert is not evidence that the contents of a paper has “become generally known by the bulk of the wider community of medicinal chemists with an interest in anti-HCV research”. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 3:58 pm
LJ Robin Jacob recorded in chapter 5 of his most recommendable book “IP and other Things” (Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2015) a speech that he held in St. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Commentary Floyd LJ’s analysis of the issue of plausibility is interesting and patentees will be pleased to see the Court of Appeal has reiterated that plausibility is a relatively low, threshold test. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
However, Binchy J declined to grant injunctions requiring Facebook either to remove allegedly defamatory posts from the account or to prevent the material in them from being re-posted, on the grounds that Facebook could rely on the defence of innocent publication in section 27 of the 2009 Act and on the hosting immunity conferred by Regulation 18 of the European Communities (Directive 2000/31/EC) Regulations 2003 (SI No 68 of 2003) (transposing Article 14 of the e-Commerce… [read post]
