Search for: "In Re Petition for Rule of Court, Etc."
Results 81 - 100
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
IN RE: GRACE OLAECHEA VS. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
But, none of the groups stated that they sought consolidation with other cases, their aim being to avoid conflicting pretrial rulings, and for providing consistency in the supervision of pretrial matters, etc. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 6:54 pm
This procedure reopens your criminal case, dismisses the conviction, and re-closes the case without a conviction. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
All we can do now is hope that the Supreme Court grants review of the inevitable certiorari petition, as the Sixth Circuit denied en banc review on October 14, 2010. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Last week a Pennsylvania court of appeals ruled in favor of upholding a prior decision that Sherri Shepherd pay child support. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:44 am
Both individuals and entities (corporations, LLCs, etc.) can file Chapter 7 bankruptcy petitions. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:29 am
In the EU, the CJEU's controversial ruling in Case C-128/11 UsedSoft gave rise to limited circumstances where downloaded computer software could be lawfully re-sold on the basis that the distribution right under the Software Directive had been exhausted. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:43 am
Notice And Motions For Temporary Relief In An Illinois Divorce Case The number one rule in civil procedure is that you have to let the other side know what you’re doing in court. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 12:32 am
See In re Payless Cashways, Inc., 306 B.R. 243 (8th Cir. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:18 am
Rather, each unit owner holds fee simple title to their apartment or commercial unit and an undivided interest in the building’s common elements (the land, lobby, basement, corridors, elevators, etc.). [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:07 am
(If you’re interested, you can read the cert. petition, the brief in opposition and the reply by clicking on “Documents” here; you can also read an amicus brief, which I wrote on behalf of nine law professors, including myself, here.) 1. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Registrar General, Supreme Court of India (1996) 3 SCC 114, the Court held the reconsideration of the final decision of the Supreme Court after review petition is dismissed by way of writ petition under article 32 of the Constitution cannot be sustained. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellees. 1st District.Attorneys -- Attorney's fees contract -- Trial court erred in denying petition for approval of a straight 40% contingency fee contract for representation of petitioner in a medical malpractice action -- Trial court is required by rule to approve petition as long as it finds that petitioner understood the rights that she was waiving and the terms of the fee contractIN RE: CHARLES BUGGS, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH LITA… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:17 am
If you answered “Yes” to #1, you’re right. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 3:59 pm
GRIMMETT CASE: The Idaho bankruptcy court was one of the first to rule on bifurcated fee arrangements in the case of In re Grimmett. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:51 am
The court discussed Rule 1006 (summaries of voluminous records) and Rule 803(6) (the business records exception to hearsay). [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
*Re: An American Third Party.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
Supreme Court of Florida.Res judicata -- District court properly dismissed antitrust counterclaim in instant case where claim raised was identical to claim raised and litigated in another antitrust lawsuit between the same parties, and circuit court affirmed dismissal of that complaint -- Appellees' request for award of fees and costs under rule 38 deniedAKANTHOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, CNH CA MASTER ACCOUNT, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Family law forms -- Amendments -- Name change petitions
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS. [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
… But the rule enunciated by the American courts has no application under our constitutional set-up. [read post]
