Search for: "In Re Rb" Results 81 - 100 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 11:32 am by Steve Bainbridge
They're playing Indy and Jax, respectively, so both could be in for big games. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by Michael Froomkin
We didn’t want to re-open negotiations…we had a perfectly functioning agreement…it just wasn’t as good as some voices in Europe thought it could be in terms of privacy principles.In the Q&A I asked what effect recent work on the failure of de-anonymization would have on the work of her department. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:39 am by Luke Green
See In Re Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (Applying Morrison to dismiss both '33 and '34 Act claims by plaintiffs who purchased RBS shares on a non-U.S. exchange). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:35 am by Kim Zetter
The company began to notify customers affected by the breach, and re-issue about 217,000 new cards on June 3, but then waited until June 9 to disclose it to the public. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:16 am by Jordan Furlong
The future for law firms is going to be in looking and feeling like a law firm, rather than like Co-operative Legal Services or RBS Legal. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Discussing her decision, Rihanna explained: "It doesn't mean we're gonna make up, or even talk again. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Misty Dalke
In In re Royal Bank of Scotland PLC Securities Litigation, S.D.N.Y., 09 Civ. 300 (DAB) 1/11/2011, the court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims on the basis of the Supreme Court's decision in Morrison. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:01 am
In addition, three companies (Official Payments Corporation at 888-872-9829, Link2Gov Corporation at 888-729-1040, and RBS WorldPay, Inc. at 888-972-9829) are authorized service providers for purposes of accepting credit card charges from both electronic and paper filers. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  Real violation claims aren’t particularly easy to plead, but they’re even harder to prove, so this is just the beginning. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:47 am by Stevie E. Leahy
 He argued for heightened scrutiny, but pointed out that even under RB the law will fail. [read post]