Search for: "In Re Rules Governing Conduct of Attorneys in Fla." Results 81 - 100 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2010, 5:23 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Attorney General: Dan Gelber would be a great Attorney General. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm by Dan Bushell
To deal with this issue, Florida’s appellate courts came up with an exception to the general rules of claim-splitting and res judicata. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:32 pm by Dan Bushell
To deal with this issue, Florida’s appellate courts came up with an exception to the general rules of claim-splitting and res judicata. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in February and the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Pomales-Lebron, No. 06-1620 "Conviction for drug-trafficking offenses is affirmed where: 1) there was no prejudicial error in allowing a government witness to testify about conduct not charged in the indictment and disclosed after the trial was underway; and 2) the court lacks jurisdiction over defendant's motion for a new trial since defendant failed to properly present the motion to the district court. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
White, No. 06-4185 Conviction and sentence for distribution of crack cocaine are affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the prosecution to introduce evidence concerning a witness' other government cooperation in order to rehabilitate the witness; 2) the defendant was predisposed to violate the law, thus the government did not engage in sentencing entrapment; and 3) the district court did not err in considering drug sales not included in… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:20 am
They're employed by the cruise line. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
§ 2259(a) governs restitution for offenses involving sexual exploitation and other abuse of children, including possession of covered images. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by Bexis
Earlier this week we tossed up a short post about a case involving FDA warning letters – at least that’s what we thought.What we got back was a rip-roaring comment from the attorney for the plaintiff in the case, Regenerative Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  The court looked to federal precedent because Florida’s rule "duplicated" the federal rule governing consolidation (Rule 42(a)). [read post]