Search for: "In Re US Lines, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 3,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2009, 11:42 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:15 am
" See In re Pitney Bowes, Inc., 125 U.S.P.Q.2d 1417, 1420 (T.T.A.B. 2018); In re DSM Pharms., Inc., 87 U.S.P.Q.2d 1623, 1626 (T.T.A.B. 2008). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
It was less than a year ago that the US-based company France.com Inc. lost its registered rights in France to the domain name and trade mark ‘France.com’ in favour of the rights held by the Republic of France (hereand here). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
You're not going to win that one. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 4:57 am
In re Valenite Inc., Serial No. 76482852 (July 31, 2007) [precedential].ReamerApplicant Valenite relied on Lands' End Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
Patriot Risk and Insurance Services, Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 6:06 am
If your business model includes extensive use of independent contractors, you’re going to want to pay attention to the Ninth Circuit's decision in NLRB v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:11 pm
See In re Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:11 pm
See In re Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
In re Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc., Serial No. 77967242 (June 29, 2010) [not precedential]. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:26 am
Experient Inc., Opposition No. 91190253 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark EXPERIENT for meeting, convention, exhibition, seminar, event, tradeshow, and conference services, in view of Opposer's alleged prior use of the identical mark EXPERIENT for event marketing and planning services].January 15, 2014 - 2 PM: Citigroup Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
See In re McGraw-Hill Glob. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:18 pm
The Pitre, Broussard, and Bufkin line of cases blurred the line between the duty and breach elements of Louisiana’s negligence analysis, causing uncertainty among courts and litigants. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
In re Farouk Systems, Inc., Serial No. 78646723 (June 19, 2008) [not precedential].The Board observed that a mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) if (1) the term misdescribes the character, quality, function, composition, or use of the goods, (2) prospective purchasers are likely to believe that the misdescription actually describes the goods, and (3) the misdescription is likely to affect the purchasing decision.Applicant did not clarify whether its goods contain silk (it… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
Now they’re all the rage in the courtroom. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
In re Eagle Crest, Inc., Serial No. 77114518 (August 10, 2010) [not precedential].The Board began by observing that "not every designation adopted with the intention that it performs as a trademark and even labeled as a trademark necessarily accomplishes that purpose. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 3:22 am
Wild Brain Entertainment, Inc., Opposition No. 91205896 [Opposition to registration of DIZZY for video game software, video and audit recordings, on the ground of lack of bona fide intent].December 13, 2016 - 2 PM: In re Nomi Network, Inc., Serial No. 85677459 [Section 2(d) refusal of NOMI FOR A BETTER LIFE for "On-line retail store services featuring clothing items, excluding footwear, that are specifically identified as made by survivors of sex slavery and… [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:52 am
Serial No. 88796957 [Refusal to register POWERZONE for "shower heads" for failure to function as a trademark as used on the submitted specimens.]April 26, 2023 - 2 PM [Virtual]: In re People Online, Inc., Serial No. 90489798 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of PEOPLE ONLINE for various Internet-related software and services.] [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
In re Nielsen Business Media, Inc., 93 USPQ2d 1545 (TTAB 2010) [precedential].In response to a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of its intent-to-use application, Applicant claimed that the mark THE BOLLYWOOD REPORTER had acquired distinctiveness and was therefore registrable under Section 2(f). [read post]
