Search for: "In Re Underhill"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 1:07 am
"Now, you're getting old, man, I am going to have to trade you in," he said he told her. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:04 am
Class actions get a bad rap this week from David Nieporent at Overlawyered and Kevin Underhill at Lowering the Bar. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:02 am
SNET (download here), federal judge Stefan Underhill has upheld SNET's conversion to a cash benefit plan from 1995. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 1:56 pm
As an attorney, you’re in a position of authority. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
;Since we're hanging out in the ER at the moment, you can check out CharityDocs' tale of unrelenting horror as he tries to get a child admitted in Dereliction of Duty. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:45 am
We're talking serious ethical issues here with e-chasing, and I wonder who the lucky lawyer will be that becomes the test case. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 3:38 pm
I learned of this from Kevin Underhill, a Northern California attorney and proprietor of Lowering the Bar. [read post]
30 May 2010, 2:08 pm
But you’re still talking about journalists taking it upon themselves to lie and deceive in pursuit of a story”. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Battle for Blawg Review of the Year Like the movie business, with its Academy Awards, the business of blog reviewing is highly competitive. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Yet the “comment” defence requires – and is likely to continue to require – that what is published must be “recognisable as comment” or, since the Court of Appeal held that the defence should be re-named as “honest opinion”, “recognisable as opinion”. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
The Battle for Blawg Review of the Year Like the movie business, with its Academy Awards, the business of blog reviewing is highly competitive. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm
Merelie v Newcastle Primary Health Care Trust [2006] EWHC 1433 (QB) Underhill J. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
In a re-post from The Privacy Perspective Blog, Suneet Sharma unpicks calls for the implementation of a federal privacy law in the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 4:51 pm
As pointed out by Robert Jenrick (Home Office Minister), “we’re not privy to the police’s conversations with Nicola Bulley’s family and I don’t think it would be right for us to speculate on why they’ve chosen to make those comments”. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 1:08 pm
I doubt we’re listening to the same folks, but the ones I’ve heard say “not all Muslims are terrorists” are talking about the problem of inferring group characteristics from what you know about only a few group members. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
The judge in the case of “In re Yahoo! [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
It certainly offends Article 6 ECHR, and the Convention has been regarded as part of the English and a European ordre public (Loizidou v Turkey (Article 50), para 48; In re J [2005] UKHL 40, [2006] 1 AC 80, para 44); the Convention is also, in any event, based also on age-old rules of English law (cf. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Shook Hardy & Bacon Blog-Tolerant I had to search and then read through Kevin Underhill's bio to find this blog mentioned. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
The Nieman Lab has a post setting out “12 principles journalists should follow to make sure they’re protecting their sources” – setting out the so-called “Perugia Principles”. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
” The letter called for a completely independent re-analysis of the PACE trial data, since the authors have refused to publish the results they outlined in their original protocol. [read post]
