Search for: "In re: Brunetti"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
Brunetti regarding morality and freedom of expression.Alex Woolgar reports that Red Bull sues rival F1 sponsor Rich Energy for trade mark infringement.Let's get ready for Never Too LateCopyrightNeil Wilkof discusses issues relating to the rights of immigrant minors in their drawings in connection with their detention along the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
[There are costs for deleting goods, but they’re small fees.] [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
You're wasting my time! [read post]
2 May 2025, 10:39 am
See it in initial indifference to what makes a TM a good identifier (Tam, Brunetti) shifting to a debate about history and tradition (requiring them to distort TM law). [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
Recall that most doubted cert. would be granted in Brunetti. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Administrative Law Judge Ritchie made some compelling points on Tam’s re-appropriation argument as well. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
They’re not doing ordinary judging. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Tam & Brunetti: wiping away bars and then putting pressure on failure to function as the limit on registration. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Ds will have strong argument if they’re using other designs, words, or logos. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:12 am
They’re trying to slip it in instead, as if it’s already a prohibited category of speech. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Current confusion doctrine is very different in many ways, two of the most important being, first, that there is no materiality requirement—consumers need not care at all about the thing they’re supposedly confused about, and that itself makes confusion easier to find because people aren’t careful about things they don’t care about. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
For a detailed discussion of the facts of this trademark dispute, see my spring 2023 guest post on the Technology & Marketing Law Blog about the Federal Circuit’s opinion in In re Elster and fall 2023 post on this blog after the Supreme Court oral argument in Vidal v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
” When John Sommer, counsel for Erik Brunetti, stepped up to the plate, he faced a similarly active round of questioning. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Although Tam rejected that argument, some of the Court seemed to have buyer’s remorse in Brunetti, recognizing that almost all of TM law is content based; if we’re going to have a registration system at all, we need to make some content based distinctions. [read post]
2 May 2025, 9:02 am
But reasons to resist this conclusion: whether they’re serving a source-indicating function (or content-indicating function) but also what the costs of recognizing such protection are (cf. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
That issue is currently being litigated in In re Brunetti in the Federal Circuit. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
Brunetti). [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Maybe we’re going [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is currently considering this issue in In re Brunetti, a trademark case involving the government’s denial of an application to register the word FUCT. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
Bonnie Strunk admitted to fourth-degree criminal tax fraud before Supreme Court Justice John Brunetti in Syracuse. [read post]
