Search for: "In re: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION" Results 81 - 100 of 758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2022, 7:27 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
EARN IT’s Problems Aren’t an Accident, They’re the Point The bill’s issues regarding encryption and privacy (to say nothing of all the other stuff) are unlikely to be fixed, because to its sponsors, they’re not bugs, they’re features. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Hepworth Holzer, LLP
Though names and details have been edited to protect the privacy of our clients, the value of the information remains. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
The Facebook accounts linked to the defendant’s YouTube channel, BBTV, which specialises in broadcasting Pidgin English in the UK and internationally. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:21 pm by Jason Kelley
In a 2019 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on encryption, Senator Graham—a coauthor of the EARN IT Act—told representatives from Apple and Facebook that encryption was not going to block them from access: “​​You’re going to find a way to do this or we’re going to go do it for you. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am by Joe Mullin
Patent trolls like Personal Audio don’t make products or services themselves, but instead use their patents to threaten litigation against others, unless they get paid a patent licensing fee. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by Christian Romero
We worried about Facebook controlling speech. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:38 am by Katherine Pompilio
Panelists include Brookings fellows Chris Meserole and Alexandra Seigel; SMEX researcher Afef Abrougui; and Dina Hussein, head of Counterterrorism and Dangerous Organisations for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at Facebook/Meta. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
In Case C-498/16 Max Schrems v Facebook Ireland[4] the Court of Justice of the EU in 2018 denied the privilege of EU law for consumers to sue in their local court[5] to a representative (ie Max Schrems) in a representative privacy litigation against Facebook under Austrian law. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Hacked Off has re-published lessons from the phone hacking scandal: 10 years on, first published on Campaign.org. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The threat of merger-related litigation has not gone away, but the current form of the threat just is not reflected in class action litigation statistics. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
With Facebook’s 2020 revenue coming in at $86 billion, that’s a potential $17.2 billion fine. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Kristian Soltes
With Facebook’s 2020 revenue coming in at $86 billion, that’s a potential $17.2 billion fine. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:00 am by Joe Mullin
She’s a former Associate General Counsel at Google, where she worked on groundbreaking litigation and legislation around internet platform liability. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Inforrm had a piece on what the recent decision in Park v Hall & Anr [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB) means for the standards litigants-in-person are held to in libel claims. [read post]
The Supreme Court in AMG foreclosed the FTC’s ability to pursue monetary remedies under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
UPS Facebook Gets Bad Ruling In Face-Scanning Privacy Case–In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation Defective Call-to-Action Dooms Online Contract Formation–Sgouros v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 10:10 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Amazon Facebook and Zynga Privacy Litigation Dismissed With Prejudice [Catch up Post]   The post Privacy Lawsuit Based on Website Tracking by Service Provider Trimmed appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
It is unclear, however, whether Chinese publishing houses secured the rights to re-publish the novel from Rooney. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
Thompson said recently that the committee is busy sorting through “so much information” that “there might not be a need for an immediate hearing” any time soon: “[W]e’re getting a lot of stuff that we didn’t know about. [read post]